Give are two figures comparing the destination of graduate and post graduate students who did not participate in full-time work after leaving their college in 2008.
It is evident from the information provided that the vast majority of graduate students, exactly 29665 students, decided to continue their studies. Following that, part-time activities ranked second with a slightly more number of students participated in that the unemployed ones. Moreover, a minority of students, merely 3500 ones, were fond of voluntary activities.
Moving on to the next chart, it can be seen that the number of postgraduate students enrolled in further study (2725 students) were comparable to the ones being active in part-time work by roughly 200 students more. Clearly, a moderate number of students, exactly 1625 ones, were jobless, while only an insignificant number of student were interested in volunteer jobs.
Overall, both graduate and postgraduate students found further study as their destination, whereas only a minority of them felt an interest in participating in voluntary work.
- The pie charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- IELTS Task 1 - Tables give information about sales of fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries 67
- Task 2: Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negativedevelopment?Give reasons for your answ 73
- Some people say that the only reason for learning a foreign language is in order to travel to or work in a foreign country. Others say that these are not the only reasons why someone should learn a foreign language.Discuss both views and give your own opp 73
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons whe 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, second, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.48453608247 107% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 4.92783505155 20% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 5.05154639175 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.03092783505 165% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 32.9175257732 30% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 26.3917525773 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.85567010309 78% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 925.0 937.175257732 99% => OK
No of words: 166.0 206.0 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57228915663 4.54256449028 123% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.78020617076 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92215869993 2.54303337028 115% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 127.690721649 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.638554216867 0.622605031667 103% => OK
syllable_count: 284.4 290.88556701 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.41237113402 120% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.13402061856 22% => OK
Article: 2.0 0.824742268041 243% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 1.44329896907 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 12.6804123711 55% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 16.3608247423 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 36.1956136704 44.8134815571 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.142857143 76.5299724578 173% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7142857143 16.8248392259 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.14285714286 4.34317383033 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 7.41237113402 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.94845360825 51% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201176066627 0.216113520407 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0946431585011 0.0766984524023 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106574511122 0.0603063233224 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143778610952 0.12726935374 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113325147084 0.0580467560999 195% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 8.37731958763 199% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 70.7449484536 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 3.82989690722 292% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 7.45979381443 180% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 8.71597938144 176% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 7.59969072165 123% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 41.2886597938 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 8.62886597938 139% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 8.54432989691 131% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 8.15463917526 147% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.