A section of the community reckons that the growth of technology has brought us myriads of options to choose in recent years. Although I agree that there are a multitude of choices a person can make, I personally believe that they are yet to fulfill people's needs.
There is little doubt that recent advances in technology have opened new door for us to go through. People are now offered a wide variety of options to pick in various fields. Furthermore, technological developments have facilitated our access to the things that used to be assumed unachievable. To exemplify how we now have more choices with an easier access compared to the past, we can look at space travelling. People can now decide to travel to space and visit celestial beauties thst used to be a dream for mankind.
However, it is evident that the range of choices we can make is still suffering from lack of many things we desire to select. The current picks are not fulfilling and leave people with just a vague dream which can never come true. A good example of this experienced by people who wish to live in Mars. There is no doubt that no possible means exists to help them accomplish their aim and make the decision of their desire. Therefore, it is clear proof to illustrate that the choices available for people is not adequate.
In conclusion, I once again reaffirm my position that although people's range of options has widened in recent years, it is still far from satisfying all needs of people.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, look, so, still, therefore, in conclusion, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1231.0 1615.20841683 76% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71647509579 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59407629188 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574712643678 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 385.2 506.74238477 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.8577015318 49.4020404114 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.6923076923 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0769230769 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92307692308 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136933717789 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0468227253229 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0321192307443 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0738143889819 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0289565289714 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 12.4159519038 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.