The bar graphs illustrate how many graduate and postgraduate students decided to choose among four different destinations (exclude full-time work) when they graduate in 2008.
In general, it is evident that both undergraduates And postgraduates had a tendency to choose further studies while the opposite was true for volunteer work. In addition, the biggest difference was in the number of undergraduates selecting further studies and volunteer work.
As can be seen from the graph, with regards to the number of undergraduates who enrolled in further studies, it stood at just under 30000. The figure for undergraduates choosing part-time jobs was somewhere in the vicinity of 19000. The number of undergraduate learners selecting unemployment, which was over 15000, significantly exceeded volunteer work, at 1000.
Look at the graph in more detail, regarding postgraduates, the number of people who decided to get further studies took the lead at approximately 2600, which was followed by the figure for part-time jobs, at 2500. The quality of individuals choosing unemployment came next, with 1600, while the figure for volunteers came bottom, at under 500.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, regarding, so, while, in addition, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.48453608247 94% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 4.92783505155 20% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 5.05154639175 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.03092783505 198% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 32.9175257732 12% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 26.3917525773 125% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.85567010309 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 988.0 937.175257732 105% => OK
No of words: 179.0 206.0 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51955307263 4.54256449028 122% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.78020617076 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15034268463 2.54303337028 124% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 127.690721649 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.603351955307 0.622605031667 97% => OK
syllable_count: 289.8 290.88556701 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.13402061856 22% => OK
Article: 6.0 0.824742268041 728% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.83505154639 109% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 1.44329896907 554% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 12.6804123711 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 16.3608247423 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 34.4598951682 44.8134815571 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.5 76.5299724578 161% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.375 16.8248392259 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 4.34317383033 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 7.41237113402 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.49484536082 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.94845360825 25% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0985483895441 0.216113520407 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0507050864557 0.0766984524023 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0493864576614 0.0603063233224 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.076758727424 0.12726935374 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0575701475559 0.0580467560999 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 8.37731958763 189% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 70.7449484536 69% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 7.45979381443 160% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 8.71597938144 172% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 7.59969072165 109% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 41.2886597938 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 8.62886597938 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 8.54432989691 126% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 8.15463917526 135% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.