The graphs illustrate how many students in the UK University, the amount of money that the government spent on each learners from 1997 to 2000 as well as the proportion of students from different families’ income background.
In general, it is obvious that in 2000, the number of students in UK university was highest. In addition, the amount of the authority spending on each student experienced an downward trend. It is also evident that the majority of learners who lived in high income families.
As can be seen from the graphs, starting at roughly 1.3 millions in 1997, the number of undergraduates who studied in the UK university was lowest. This figure climbed to hit the highest point of under 2.0 million in 2000, which followed by a minimal drop to roughly 1.7million. Regarding the government budget on each student, there was a considerable fall from 600 to 130 between 1997 and 2000, and then remained stable until 2000.
Look at the pie chart in more detail, 60% students from high income families. Meanwhile, the percentage of students from medium income families stood at 32%, which was four times as much as the figure for individuals from low income ones, with 8%
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 172, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ty spending on each student experienced an downward trend. It is also evident that...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, regarding, so, then, well, while, in addition, in general, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 997.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93564356436 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74438318297 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584158415842 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8140529708 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.777777778 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4444444444 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.44444444444 5.23603664747 180% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139599296792 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0686334187128 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.060680941453 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0973515479172 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0497909816064 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.