the graph bellows shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three countries.
The given line graph depicts the percentage of hexagenerian and above aged population in different countries in given interval of time.
At a glance, it is observed that the striking factor being the trend of overall enhancement in proportion. In 1940, only 5% of the population was hexagenerian in Japan. Whereas 7% and 9% proportion of Sweden and America. In following 40 years, dipped was measured up to 3% in population of Japan. Where is the hexagenerian population of the Sweden and America was double of the population of Japan with proportion of 9% and 11% respectively. In 2000, Sweden surpass the population of America at the 14% and gradually rises to 20% in 2010. In 2027, proliferation will be measured in population of Japan and will gradually rise to 25% from 10%. On other hand, population of Sweden and America will gradually Rises with same proportion up to 25% with the difference of 2% between them.
In the nutshell, hexagenerian population of Japan gain momentum from lower percentage to highest percentage. On other hand, proportion of Sweden and America remain same throughout the given century. This is a boy.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 458, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Sweden) must be used with a third-person verb: 'surpasses'.
Suggestion: surpasses
...% and 11% respectively. In 2000, Sweden surpass the population of America at the 14% an...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 706, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'rise'
Suggestion: Rise
...on of Sweden and America will gradually Rises with same proportion up to 25% with the...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 87, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'to the highest'.
Suggestion: to the highest
...pan gain momentum from lower percentage to highest percentage. On other hand, proportion o...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.48453608247 107% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 4.92783505155 61% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 5.05154639175 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.03092783505 66% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 32.9175257732 12% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 26.3917525773 178% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 3.85567010309 441% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 949.0 937.175257732 101% => OK
No of words: 190.0 206.0 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99473684211 4.54256449028 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.78020617076 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01465028544 2.54303337028 119% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 127.690721649 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.478947368421 0.622605031667 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 297.0 290.88556701 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.13402061856 22% => OK
Article: 1.0 0.824742268041 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 1.44329896907 554% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6804123711 95% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 16.3608247423 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9130923778 44.8134815571 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.0833333333 76.5299724578 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8333333333 16.8248392259 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.916666666667 4.34317383033 21% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.29896907216 70% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 2.54639175258 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 7.41237113402 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.94845360825 203% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161152761787 0.216113520407 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0647077804608 0.0766984524023 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0438254733067 0.0603063233224 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105436816717 0.12726935374 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0315145095669 0.0580467560999 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 8.37731958763 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 70.7449484536 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 7.45979381443 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 8.71597938144 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.12 7.59969072165 94% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 41.2886597938 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 8.62886597938 93% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 8.54432989691 94% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 8.15463917526 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.