In recent years many small local shops have closed because customers travel to large shopping centers or malls to do their shopping Is this a positive or negative development

Many people prefer to shop at huge shopping malls as they get everything at a single place, whereas shopping from the local shops requires a multiple stops to different stores. I believe, big shopping centers provide lot of benefits, as it save time of an individual and also helps to rise the economy of the city by providing number of employment opportunities, needed to maintain the quality of the mall.

A major advantage of shopping at malls is one can buy varieties of products from one place. In today's fast pacing life, people do not have enough time to stop by different shops to collect various items in need. So, in order to save both time and energy supermarkets seems to be the perfect option. Apart from shopping opportunities, these big malls provides different entertainments options, such as theaters, gaming zones and cafeterias. Along with shopping, people can enjoy themselves by undertaking such entertaining activities too.

Other than all such entertaining stuffs, one more important thing these malls provide is, they help to boost up city's economy. This can be said, as malls this huge needs number of manpower to maintain it. For instance, lot of job opportunities like cleaning staff, store managers, shopkeepers, waiters and many such doors to working roles could be open.

On the other hand, due to closure of the local shops, the local community is getting affected. As these shopkeepers are running out of their business, it brings financial crisis to their community. However, to save their business, local stores should promote some offers and discounts in order to attract customers. Also, they can focus on the locally available goods and pull in the targeted customers to them.

In conclusion, supermalls provides many benefits in terms of saving time and energy of people. Also, it helps to provide employment to the people and help the city to rise economically. However, the local shop owners can save their business and can overcome from the negative side of these malls by providing discounts and promoting locally produced food items and products.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (2 votes)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, whereas, apart from, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.48453608247 94% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 4.92783505155 183% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 5.05154639175 218% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.03092783505 0% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 32.9175257732 61% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 26.3917525773 212% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 3.85567010309 78% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1758.0 937.175257732 188% => OK
No of words: 344.0 206.0 167% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11046511628 4.54256449028 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 3.78020617076 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72935859194 2.54303337028 107% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 127.690721649 150% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55523255814 0.622605031667 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 546.3 290.88556701 188% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.13402061856 77% => OK
Article: 3.0 0.824742268041 364% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.83505154639 163% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 1.44329896907 485% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 12.6804123711 134% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 16.3608247423 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.8710521834 44.8134815571 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.411764706 76.5299724578 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2352941176 16.8248392259 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.82352941176 4.34317383033 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.29896907216 116% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 7.41237113402 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.49484536082 134% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.94845360825 25% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266829486383 0.216113520407 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0793155995491 0.0766984524023 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0751904880272 0.0603063233224 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149994508162 0.12726935374 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0740226357322 0.0580467560999 128% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 8.37731958763 153% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 70.7449484536 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 7.45979381443 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 8.71597938144 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 7.59969072165 116% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 41.2886597938 220% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 8.62886597938 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 8.54432989691 117% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, whereas, apart from, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.48453608247 94% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 4.92783505155 183% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 5.05154639175 218% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.03092783505 0% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 32.9175257732 61% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 26.3917525773 212% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 3.85567010309 78% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1758.0 937.175257732 188% => OK
No of words: 344.0 206.0 167% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11046511628 4.54256449028 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 3.78020617076 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72935859194 2.54303337028 107% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 127.690721649 150% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55523255814 0.622605031667 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 546.3 290.88556701 188% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.13402061856 77% => OK
Article: 3.0 0.824742268041 364% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.83505154639 163% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 1.44329896907 485% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 12.6804123711 134% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 16.3608247423 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.8710521834 44.8134815571 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.411764706 76.5299724578 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2352941176 16.8248392259 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.82352941176 4.34317383033 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.29896907216 116% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 7.41237113402 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.49484536082 134% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.94845360825 25% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266829486383 0.216113520407 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0793155995491 0.0766984524023 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0751904880272 0.0603063233224 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149994508162 0.12726935374 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0740226357322 0.0580467560999 128% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 8.37731958763 153% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 70.7449484536 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 7.45979381443 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 8.71597938144 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 7.59969072165 116% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 41.2886597938 220% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 8.62886597938 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 8.54432989691 117% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.