Online shopping applications and websites have gained a lot of attention recently. More and more people prefer to buy things online rather than visiting shops or stores. As the service providers offers free delivery and exchange policies, it has resulted into more environmental damage due to increase of carbon footprint. Also, because of such practice unemployment has struck the market, as many big stores had to cut down manpower to compensate their loss in business.
With the advent of technology, online shopping is made easy. So instead of going to the store, people often prefer to buy things online that is delivered to them at their doorstep. All these online sites provides their customer with free deliveries as well as cost free exchange policies, to which people often misuse. This can be said as sometimes people make multiple number of small order instead of one single order. This leads to more damage to the environment in terms of carbon emission by the vehicles used to provide at home deliveries. Secondly, as these deliveries are done in multiple packaging, the excess packaged materials land in the landfills increasing waste generation and affecting the environment.
On the other hand, such online stores do not need skilled work force, like managers and sales executives due to which a lot of job opportunities have been cut down. Also, the big stores or malls that were able to provide employment to hundreds of people, but because of this online trend many stores had been shut down due to loss in business. And, therefore lot of jobs are lost. The local stores often buy handmade products from the local artisan, but they loose their job as people by things online and do not visit the stores near by.
In conclusion, even though online shopping save a lot of time of people. The disadvantages that it has on the environment will affect our survival in a long run. And, the unemployment is making more people jobless affecting financial condition of many people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 246, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e delivery and exchange policies, it has resulted into more environmental damage ...
^^
Line 5, column 460, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...oducts from the local artisan, but they loose their job as people by things online an...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 531, Rule ID: NEAR_BY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nearby'?
Suggestion: nearby
...ings online and do not visit the stores near by. In conclusion, even though online s...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1667.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97611940299 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62070172336 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54328358209 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1380493017 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0588235294 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7058823529 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.52941176471 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220389341153 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0740666910942 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0420899797229 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133109266929 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0160379311355 0.056905535591 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.