Increase in the waste generation has affected our environment to a great extent. It is often argued that the amount of garbage produces is increasing day by day. This is due high use of non-degradable products and unnecessary buying of food products. To overcome this situation, government can enact green tax and also instill the citizens to recycle more.
With the increasing population size, more resources are utilized, and this leads to generation of huge amount of waste. Also, lifestyle play a major role in contributing to the waste generation. As today majority of people have a busy lifestyle, so during grocery shopping they tend to buy more food items than required, so to last them for a month. This practice have led to increase in the production of food waste to a great extent. A survey conducted by municipal corporation of Ahmedabad stated that 60% of waste produces included thrown away food items. This food otherwise could have been provided to the poor, but instead it ends up in the dump yard.
A serious action needs to e taken in order to avoid such waste generation. Government can start up a donation program, in which the unused food can be donated to the poor people of the country. For example, in Malaysia,a Food NGO was started in 2019, and this has resulted in 40% less production of their total waste. Also, government can help to provide recycle bins in every street, so by recycling products, the amount of garbage generated will decrease immensely. And, lastly government can pass a law of taxation on people who produce more waste and they shall be charged for their own actions.
In conclusion, waste generation is a really sensitive issue, resulting highly due to neglect of people towards food wastage. This needs to be regulated by government by organizing food donation camps and instilling people with recycling habits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 219, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , a
...of the country. For example, in Malaysia,a Food NGO was started in 2019, and this ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, lastly, really, so, still, as to, for example, in conclusion, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1558.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94603174603 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72922464641 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561904761905 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.600616078 49.4020404114 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.6470588235 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5294117647 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.52941176471 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16306908823 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0547304147523 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.048559695307 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107234319391 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0469124020736 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.