Some parents believe that reading books for entertainment is a waste of time for children and they think that their children should only read serious educational books.
What is your opinion?
Books are an important source of knowledge. Some parents nowadays believe that children should only study serious educational material as reading books of entertainment is a waste of time. I totally disagree with this statement. In my opinion, reading books of entertainment not only rejuvenate mind but also imbibes intelligence in young children.
Firstly reading serious education books can reduce the creativity of the adolescents hence affecting their performance. As per a recent study was done by McLaren university children, it was published that juveniles who had entertainment books like comics, stories as a part of their curriculum performed better in tertiary exams as compared to adolescents who studied only educational books. Additionally, it was also noticed that adolescents who had a mixed curriculum of books which included educational, as well as entertaining content, were more eager to learn.
Secondly, entertainment books like comics, stories and puzzle solvers narrate educational content through vivid ways. Although the teaching mechanism is different from serious books however they deliver the same message. For instance, puzzle solving books help increase the aptitude of the juveniles from a tender age which helps them to score higher in competitive examinations. Similarly, comic and story book act a source of entertainment and rejuvenate the mind of the student when they feel bored hence helping them to concentrate on studies better. In recent research on adolescents attending to tertiary education, it is mentioned that around 80 per cent of children who cracked competitive examination were those who studied puzzle solving books.
To sum up, entertainment books play a pivotal role in providing valuable information to children and hence parents should encourage their kids to study such books as it helps them in achieving professional success.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, second, secondly, similarly, so, well, for instance, as well as, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.48453608247 120% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 4.92783505155 61% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 5.05154639175 99% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 3.03092783505 396% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 20.0 32.9175257732 61% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 26.3917525773 140% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 3.85567010309 363% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1614.0 937.175257732 172% => OK
No of words: 287.0 206.0 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62369337979 4.54256449028 124% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 3.78020617076 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05605304827 2.54303337028 120% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 127.690721649 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574912891986 0.622605031667 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 504.0 290.88556701 173% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.41237113402 127% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.13402061856 44% => OK
Article: 0.0 0.824742268041 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.83505154639 163% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 1.44329896907 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6804123711 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 16.3608247423 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.60990337 44.8134815571 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.153846154 76.5299724578 162% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0769230769 16.8248392259 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4615384615 4.34317383033 241% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 7.41237113402 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.49484536082 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.94845360825 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.367101926521 0.216113520407 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133495779544 0.0766984524023 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.135618733221 0.0603063233224 225% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236793108432 0.12726935374 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123751150241 0.0580467560999 213% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 8.37731958763 192% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 70.7449484536 46% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 3.82989690722 292% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 7.45979381443 190% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 8.71597938144 176% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 7.59969072165 121% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 41.2886597938 196% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 8.62886597938 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 8.54432989691 126% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 8.15463917526 135% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.