Cleanliness is next to godliness, whether it's workplace or home. Thus, it's absolutely right in saying that we should keep clean our office and house alike. Therefore I completely agree with the statement and in this essay we will discuss vitality of systematized workspace and it's impact on our productivity.
Surely, It takes great deal of time and patience to organise and key to do it lies in minimum time with less effort. However, because of complexity and diversity, nature of work needs different strategy from our domestic cleaning techniques. Therefore, social conduct experts suggest to prioritize tasks according to importance so that there will be less mess when we leave office. Similarly, taking regular assessment from company officials and giving talk session about necessity of clearing rubbish will be helpful and motivative. Certainly, residence premises requires more attention for maintaining tidiness as garbage created from kitchen activities are significantly more than a small size industry. As per City Council report, might sound as surprise, house rubbish accounts nearly 30% of overall waste production while manufacturing plants are only at the margin of 25%. Hence, as suggested by home science experts, it's easy to deal when we adopt recycling methods to reduce rubbish generation.
Dialing back to the importance of managing spotless house and office, clean environment is quintessential part of stable working conditions. Ambience is must for sturdy and robust health. Moreover, neatness indicates disciplined brain function and in contrast ugly surroundings depict irregular and erratic behaviour of person. Furthermore, productivity needs creativity which can only be possible when we are free from confusions. Even in our houses, cleanliness plays crucial role in a persons mental status. For instance, who grew in slum areas show tendency of approaching aggressively as subtleness is missing in them. It's obvious, because of their vicinity, they get negative energy which ultimately result in unprecedented outburst. According to a survey carried by Center for Social Sciences, people who train themselves for cleaning tend to become good leaders.
In a nutshell, we can safely conclude the topic by agreeing to the fact tidiness both at home and workplace is equally important. Since, it all boils down to our own physical and mental hygiene, there is no second option except to take the situation into our hands.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 72, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...s, whether its workplace or home. Thus, its absolutely right in saying that we shou...
^^^
Line 1, column 157, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... keep clean our office and house alike. Therefore I completely agree with the statement a...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 277, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'suggest prioritizing'.
Suggestion: suggest prioritizing
...ques. Therefore, social conduct experts suggest to prioritize tasks according to importance so that t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 487, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a person' or simply 'persons'?
Suggestion: a person; persons
...uses, cleanliness plays crucial role in a persons mental status. For instance, who grew i...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 842, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...people who train themselves for cleaning tend to become good leaders. In a nut...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, second, similarly, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.48453608247 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 4.92783505155 162% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 5.05154639175 297% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.03092783505 297% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 28.0 32.9175257732 85% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 26.3917525773 193% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 3.85567010309 389% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2081.0 937.175257732 222% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 381.0 206.0 185% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46194225722 4.54256449028 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 3.78020617076 117% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89873120228 2.54303337028 114% => OK
Unique words: 258.0 127.690721649 202% => Less unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.677165354331 0.622605031667 109% => OK
syllable_count: 648.9 290.88556701 223% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.41237113402 120% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.13402061856 77% => OK
Article: 0.0 0.824742268041 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.83505154639 218% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 1.44329896907 277% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 12.6804123711 158% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 16.3608247423 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.0850042855 44.8134815571 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.05 76.5299724578 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.05 16.8248392259 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 4.34317383033 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 2.54639175258 196% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 7.41237113402 175% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.49484536082 334% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.94845360825 51% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0879891005801 0.216113520407 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0246775134188 0.0766984524023 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0326130714753 0.0603063233224 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0578318436115 0.12726935374 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.028591811004 0.0580467560999 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 8.37731958763 165% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 70.7449484536 62% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 7.45979381443 160% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 8.71597938144 165% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.46 7.59969072165 138% => OK
difficult_words: 142.0 41.2886597938 344% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 8.62886597938 99% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 8.54432989691 112% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.