Dear Sir,
My name is Johnson Resource Consultant for 'Future Farms' Company. May be, you can recognise me well, if I remind you about all-day meeting which was held in your Prestigious Marriot Hotel-Beach road. However, I am writing this letter to share the feedback that we received, on behalf of our participants
Perhaps, it's better to start our conversation with positive experience we all perceived. I must agree, that ambience maintained in the lounge is incredible and friendly. Especially, welcoming our guests with garlands and giving them VIP treatment is one of the best part of our session. Further, vicinity of hotel is super clean and pleasant atmosphere made us to feel that we are on to of the mountain. Our employees, particularly applauded the fruit juices provided during the conference and infact quite few enjoyed multiple drinks. Therefore, we all sure, that all of us thoroughly enjoyed our stay so far.
All that being said, candidates expressed their dissatisfaction with the quality of food served. Mainly, as per my colleagues, two issues were commonly reported by all attendees. They are taste and quality of meals are not upto the mark. In precise, In precise, food was stale in taste and the ingredients used were not fresh. Most of the items were uncooked and as a result one of the employee's faced abdominal discomfort. Fortunately, the problem was not serious and we had to send him back home in middle of the meeting. As far as I am concerned, there was overall discontentment about food.
Considering our past relations, I recommend you to take incharge over the kitchen and cooking method. For future, please make a quality check about vegetables and other ingredients before it is used in kitchen. To avoid further complications, it's suggested to appoint chef who is trained in relevant cooking courses. Secret of sumptuous meals is in preparing food with authentic and fresh ingredients. We don't like to officially announce our negative feedback as earlier happening was pure misfortune. In order to protect fame of your hotel, it's better to implement our advices immediately.
Hope our letter did not spoil your spirit in hospitality industry and look forward to visit your restaurant again.
Yours faithfully,
Johnson
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 43, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... name is Johnson Resource Consultant for Future Farms Company. May be, you can re...
^^
Line 3, column 209, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gious Marriot Hotel-Beach road. However, I am writing this letter to share the fe...
^^
Line 9, column 142, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... For future, please make a quality check about vegetables and other ingredients b...
^^
Line 9, column 249, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'suggested appointing'.
Suggestion: suggested appointing
...en. To avoid further complications, its suggested to appoint chef who is trained in relevant cooking...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 408, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...th authentic and fresh ingredients. We dont like to officially announce our negativ...
^^^^
Line 11, column 84, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[7]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'to visiting'.
Suggestion: to visiting
...n hospitality industry and look forward to visit your restaurant again. Yours faith...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, may, so, then, therefore, well, mind you, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 7.48453608247 267% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 4.92783505155 61% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 5.05154639175 238% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.03092783505 231% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 48.0 32.9175257732 146% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 26.3917525773 193% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.85567010309 207% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1910.0 937.175257732 204% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 371.0 206.0 180% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14824797844 4.54256449028 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 3.78020617076 116% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89311636037 2.54303337028 114% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 127.690721649 182% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628032345013 0.622605031667 101% => OK
syllable_count: 581.4 290.88556701 200% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.13402061856 164% => OK
Article: 1.0 0.824742268041 121% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.83505154639 163% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 1.44329896907 416% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 12.6804123711 181% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 16.3608247423 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.1179231598 44.8134815571 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.0434782609 76.5299724578 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1304347826 16.8248392259 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.13043478261 4.34317383033 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.29896907216 116% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 2.54639175258 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 7.41237113402 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.49484536082 401% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.94845360825 76% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222130859154 0.216113520407 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0529057625459 0.0766984524023 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0477573102104 0.0603063233224 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113396858026 0.12726935374 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0698506887346 0.0580467560999 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 8.37731958763 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 70.7449484536 78% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 7.45979381443 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 8.71597938144 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 7.59969072165 119% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 41.2886597938 264% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 8.62886597938 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 8.54432989691 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 8.15463917526 135% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.