Some people say it is important to keep your home and your workplace tidy, with everything organized and in the correct place.

Because of having many equipment and stuff, living or working places are more likely to be messed up. Some people claim that keeping the facilities would be advantageous in many aspects of views, I will discuss the importance of being tidy and well-orgıned.
Those who claim the advantages of the above statement show significant reasons. Firstly, having such attitudes, not only does it avoids distractions but also avoids forgetness. Since people are programmed to do regular movements they will be more obvious in many aspects. For example, because I have been so tidy so far, constantly I can not find my clothes or some devices. Therefore because people do them movements they used to, it will lead them to have more concentration.

On the other hand, another perspective on these statements is the Loss of equipment. As long as people are well-organized, the loss will not occur, which may not lead to a waste of money. The best example of this will be the workshops. It is an undeniable fact that most industries are managed well. Thus, Loss is minimized even totally disposed of. For instance, the time I was working in the school’s workshop people did mind to put equipment where did they take it from, so that we had to buy wrenches again and again to replace them. Nowadays, money is playing an enormous role in our lives, it would be certainly will increase the permanence of the equipment which enables us to save money in the long-term.

In conclusion, both aspects of views that I made above paragraphs will be advantageous in finding people’s needs easily, as well as they will less consider losing money. They will feel the sense of having the stuff longer.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 19, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[2]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun equipment seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much equipment', 'a good deal of equipment'.
Suggestion: much equipment; a good deal of equipment
Because of having many equipment and stuff, living or working places are...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 129, Rule ID: DOES_NP_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'avoid'?
Suggestion: avoid
...having such attitudes, not only does it avoids distractions but also avoids forgetness...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 129, Rule ID: DOES_X_HAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'avoid'? As 'do' is already inflected, the verb cannot also be inflected.
Suggestion: avoid
...having such attitudes, not only does it avoids distractions but also avoids forgetness...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 177, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...istractions but also avoids forgetness. Since people are programmed to do regular mov...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 375, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...an not find my clothes or some devices. Therefore because people do them movements they u...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 429, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'mind putting'.
Suggestion: mind putting
...n the school's workshop people did mind to put equipment where did they take it from, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 127, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
... in finding people's needs easily, as well as they will less consider losing money. T...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.48453608247 227% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 4.92783505155 264% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 5.05154639175 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.03092783505 264% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 29.0 32.9175257732 88% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 26.3917525773 129% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.85567010309 233% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1407.0 937.175257732 150% => OK
No of words: 288.0 206.0 140% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88541666667 4.54256449028 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 3.78020617076 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80127001827 2.54303337028 110% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 127.690721649 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.622605031667 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 435.6 290.88556701 150% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.13402061856 66% => OK
Article: 3.0 0.824742268041 364% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 1.83505154639 327% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 1.44329896907 277% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6804123711 126% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 16.3608247423 110% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8026488475 44.8134815571 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.9375 76.5299724578 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 16.8248392259 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.375 4.34317383033 193% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 2.54639175258 275% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 7.41237113402 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.49484536082 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.94845360825 127% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0659421610924 0.216113520407 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0209803836459 0.0766984524023 27% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0297191291496 0.0603063233224 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0480115821096 0.12726935374 38% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0357189446641 0.0580467560999 62% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 8.37731958763 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 70.7449484536 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 7.45979381443 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 8.71597938144 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 7.59969072165 108% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 41.2886597938 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 8.62886597938 93% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 8.54432989691 108% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 8.15463917526 135% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.