Some people think it is more important to plant more trees in open areas in towns and cities than provide more housing. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
A certain number of individuals believe to plant more trees in open spaces in metropolises as well as towns instead of building more homes for humans. And, I concur with this kind of notion as planting more trees will provide an ample amount of benefits to modern society.
Firstly, the process of deforestation has been rapidly scaling up due to the high volume of usage of wood in various things like the production of paper to produce top-notch books for all ages of individuals and building homes near the countryside to come in vacations for enjoying in a relaxed environment. Plus, more trees are cut in colder regions, especially to produce fire with the help of woods by people to maintain their body temperature normal. Thus, for the betterment of humankind, planting more trees is required for the above uses in our daily lives.
Moreover, it is crucial for the residents of cities to incline the process of reforestation to eliminate the major problem of air pollution which is generally produced by carbon emissions from industries' smoke and automobiles. And, by planting more trees in the cities, the locals will enjoy the luxury of inhaling fresh and clean air which is a basic necessity to stay alive. According to a recent survey by Oxford University, the life span of individuals has been decreased by ten years due to the low value of the quality air index. In addition, more afforestation will reduce the effect of global warming on our planet mother earth which will be beneficial for the future generation.
To conclude, although it is quite essential to provide more housing for people, the value of planting more trees cannot be neglected. Thus, the government should maintain a balanced approach to both practices to build adequate results for mankind.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, moreover, so, thus, well, as to, in addition, kind of, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.48453608247 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 4.92783505155 122% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 5.05154639175 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.03092783505 99% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 32.9175257732 21% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 26.3917525773 216% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 3.85567010309 259% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1489.0 937.175257732 159% => OK
No of words: 299.0 206.0 145% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97993311037 4.54256449028 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 3.78020617076 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73504581495 2.54303337028 108% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 127.690721649 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581939799331 0.622605031667 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 470.7 290.88556701 162% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.13402061856 22% => OK
Article: 6.0 0.824742268041 728% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 1.44329896907 277% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6804123711 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 16.3608247423 165% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.2071979976 44.8134815571 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.363636364 76.5299724578 177% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1818181818 16.8248392259 162% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.72727272727 4.34317383033 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 7.41237113402 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.49484536082 134% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.94845360825 25% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258070822485 0.216113520407 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111041992261 0.0766984524023 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0999222041311 0.0603063233224 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179489073659 0.12726935374 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0783909096754 0.0580467560999 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 8.37731958763 186% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 70.7449484536 62% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 7.45979381443 185% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 8.71597938144 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 7.59969072165 129% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 41.2886597938 223% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 8.62886597938 214% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 12.8 8.54432989691 150% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 8.15463917526 233% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, moreover, so, thus, well, as to, in addition, kind of, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.48453608247 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 4.92783505155 122% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 5.05154639175 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.03092783505 99% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 32.9175257732 21% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 26.3917525773 216% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 3.85567010309 259% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1489.0 937.175257732 159% => OK
No of words: 299.0 206.0 145% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97993311037 4.54256449028 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 3.78020617076 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73504581495 2.54303337028 108% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 127.690721649 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581939799331 0.622605031667 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 470.7 290.88556701 162% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.13402061856 22% => OK
Article: 6.0 0.824742268041 728% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 1.44329896907 277% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6804123711 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 16.3608247423 165% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.2071979976 44.8134815571 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.363636364 76.5299724578 177% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1818181818 16.8248392259 162% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.72727272727 4.34317383033 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 7.41237113402 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.49484536082 134% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.94845360825 25% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258070822485 0.216113520407 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111041992261 0.0766984524023 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0999222041311 0.0603063233224 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179489073659 0.12726935374 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0783909096754 0.0580467560999 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 8.37731958763 186% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 70.7449484536 62% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 7.45979381443 185% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 8.71597938144 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 7.59969072165 129% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 41.2886597938 223% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 8.62886597938 214% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 12.8 8.54432989691 150% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 8.15463917526 233% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.