Dear Sir or Madam,
I have been living in the suburban Albany. You might have already been notified about the broken issue of our rubbish collection system. However, I would like to bring it your table for your quick action.
We used to have outstanding garbage collection system and it was one of the best in town. The machinery used for rubbish collection has chains and a belt in it. Local people keep their house rubbish on the belt and chains would help to rotate the belt and the rubbish would throw in to the corner. Later the same would be picked by the municipality staff. It was working good enough ever since it was introduced in our area. However, it seems like the system has been broken now. To be precisely, the chains in the machine were broken. As a result of this, belt was not able to move and garbage would be taken nowhere.
We have been dealing this issue over a week now. Consequently, this is causing health hazards to us and to our neighbors. Few irresponsible localities throwing their garbage on roads, this could potentially cause us traffic jam and we have been surrounded by the bad smile.
Therefore, I would like to urge to take this matter seriously and act on it as priority item to fix. Please send any technician to fix the chains, this wouldn’t cost much.
Yours faithfully,
Sudheerkumar Motakatla
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 33, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'taking'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'urge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: taking
...mile. Therefore, I would like to urge to take this matter seriously and act on it as ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, if, therefore, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.48453608247 187% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 4.92783505155 162% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 5.05154639175 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.03092783505 0% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 32.9175257732 91% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 26.3917525773 121% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.85567010309 78% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1109.0 937.175257732 118% => OK
No of words: 238.0 206.0 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65966386555 4.54256449028 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.78020617076 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5442798455 2.54303337028 100% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 127.690721649 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567226890756 0.622605031667 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 340.2 290.88556701 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.13402061856 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 0.824742268041 243% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 1.44329896907 69% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 12.6804123711 134% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 16.3608247423 86% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.6334670015 44.8134815571 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 65.2352941176 76.5299724578 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.0 16.8248392259 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.88235294118 4.34317383033 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.29896907216 116% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 7.41237113402 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.49484536082 268% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.94845360825 127% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268904835178 0.216113520407 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0782697662204 0.0766984524023 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0680119019796 0.0603063233224 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108279864495 0.12726935374 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0902097106972 0.0580467560999 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.5 8.37731958763 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.19 70.7449484536 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 7.45979381443 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.16 8.71597938144 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.25 7.59969072165 95% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 41.2886597938 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 8.62886597938 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 8.54432989691 89% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 8.15463917526 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.