Many people argue that the Salary is the most important reason for an employee to work for years in the same organization. I do not agree with this statement, even though salary is one of the aspect towards loyalty. I believe, growth is the main reason for a person to work in one company.
Nowadays company often offer contract to their employees in order to make them stay for long term. Such contracts ranges between 3-5 years long, and the increment are on the yearly basis that are already mentioned in the contract. A Hospital in Ahmedabad, offers their employee a contract of 5 years with an hike of 25% every year, regardless of their performance. So, such contractual terms looks attractive but the draw back is, there is lack of growth opportunities. In other words, the working environment and the position will be locked and will remain same till 5 long years.
Having said that, so instead of considering monetary benefits, many people look for the growth options, in terms of position. For instance, a person started as a Business development Executive will want to see himself at a managerial position in a long run. So this could only be possible by staying in that organization for a significant amount of time. On the contrary, a person who keeps switching jobs, will not be able to get to a top position, as there comes a question of loyalty. A survey conducted by Times job stated that people who kept jumping from one company to another had very less chance of getting a promotion.
In conclusion, even though getting a good pay is always one thing that people want to go after. However, the main reason for a person to show the loyalty toward the company is to achieve growth in their job in a long run.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 306, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...eir employee a contract of 5 years with an hike of 25% every year, regardless of t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, so, for instance, in conclusion, in other words, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.48453608247 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 4.92783505155 101% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 5.05154639175 79% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.03092783505 264% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 16.0 32.9175257732 49% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 26.3917525773 174% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 3.85567010309 363% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1428.0 937.175257732 152% => OK
No of words: 307.0 206.0 149% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.65146579805 4.54256449028 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 3.78020617076 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62465940968 2.54303337028 103% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 127.690721649 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553745928339 0.622605031667 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 437.4 290.88556701 150% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.13402061856 22% => OK
Article: 6.0 0.824742268041 728% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.83505154639 163% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 1.44329896907 277% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6804123711 118% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 16.3608247423 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 19.0783181183 44.8134815571 43% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.2 76.5299724578 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4666666667 16.8248392259 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.86666666667 4.34317383033 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 7.41237113402 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.94845360825 101% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223693569111 0.216113520407 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.079823676466 0.0766984524023 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0884732451515 0.0603063233224 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153216254347 0.12726935374 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0984693174731 0.0580467560999 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 8.37731958763 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 70.7449484536 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 7.45979381443 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 8.71597938144 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 7.59969072165 101% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 41.2886597938 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 8.62886597938 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 8.54432989691 117% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 8.15463917526 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.