The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991, and 2001.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie chart below shows the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991, and 2001. Annual spending from some aspect namely insurance, teacher salaries, furniture and equipment, resources like books, and other workers’ salaries. Divided into three times such as 1981, 1991, and 2001.
Overall, the chart of each type was varied. All of data were doing up and down. For 1981 to 1991, the most increased data is teacher salary, representing just over a half of all school spending. It raised up from 40% to 50% at 1991. Another school spending, furniture and equipment had fallen into 10% of the total. Initially, annual spending of furniture and equipment was 15% of all. But, it declined become only 5% ten years later.
Although future and equipment decreased 10% in 1991, but its increase significantly to 23% ten years later. While resources and other workers’ salary were declined in 2001 become 9% and 15%. Another data, insurance always being a less annual spending school from 1991 to 2001.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 9, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'charts'.
Suggestion: charts
The pie chart below shows the changes in annual spend...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 216, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put after the verb 'being'.
Suggestion: being always
...ome 9% and 15%. Another data, insurance always being a less annual spending school from 1991...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.48453608247 80% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 5.05154639175 218% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.03092783505 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 32.9175257732 9% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 26.3917525773 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.85567010309 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 862.0 937.175257732 92% => OK
No of words: 172.0 206.0 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01162790698 4.54256449028 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.78020617076 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48674147834 2.54303337028 98% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 127.690721649 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.616279069767 0.622605031667 99% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 290.88556701 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.13402061856 22% => OK
Article: 3.0 0.824742268041 364% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.83505154639 109% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.463917525773 862% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 1.44329896907 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6804123711 103% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 16.3608247423 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.8332707576 44.8134815571 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 66.3076923077 76.5299724578 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.2307692308 16.8248392259 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.07692307692 4.34317383033 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.29896907216 70% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 2.54639175258 79% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 7.41237113402 40% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.94845360825 228% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276520691624 0.216113520407 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104882663507 0.0766984524023 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.156074685231 0.0603063233224 259% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207754551159 0.12726935374 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12912288454 0.0580467560999 222% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 8.37731958763 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 75.2 70.7449484536 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 7.45979381443 80% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.89 8.71597938144 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 7.59969072165 105% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 41.2886597938 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 8.62886597938 64% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 8.54432989691 84% => OK
text_standard: 6.0 8.15463917526 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.