The line graph illustrates the total calling time of telecommunication in British in terms of three call types: local-fixed line, national and international - fixed line, mobiles (all calls) from 1995 to 2002.
The most noticeable feature is that local - fixed line calls are always the most call types over the whole decade, followed by national and international - fixed line call, then mobiles call. However, the proportion of local -fixed line decreases a lot, while the time of the other two types has increased significantly.
In 1995, the minutes of fixed line of local calls and national and international had 70 billions and 35 minutes, respectively. By contrast, the time of mobiles accounted for nearly 1 percent. The local calls on fixed line increased approximately 4 percent per year until 1999 and had the highest number in 1999 with 90 billions minutes. After that, the time fell steadily to 70 billions in 2002.
In comparison to the decline of local calls, national and international calls on fixed line and mobiles saw an obvious rise during the whole time period, especially mobiles. People called 2 billions minutes on mobile phone in 1995. The time increased dramatically and finally reached 10 times as many as before, namely, 40 billions minutes in 2002.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 92, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ine calls are always the most call types over the whole decade, followed by natio...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.48453608247 27% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 5.05154639175 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.03092783505 66% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 32.9175257732 6% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 26.3917525773 117% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.85567010309 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1068.0 937.175257732 114% => OK
No of words: 209.0 206.0 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11004784689 4.54256449028 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.78020617076 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86815726464 2.54303337028 113% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 127.690721649 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555023923445 0.622605031667 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 332.1 290.88556701 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.13402061856 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 0.824742268041 970% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.83505154639 109% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 1.44329896907 277% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6804123711 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 16.3608247423 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.7498792269 44.8134815571 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.8 76.5299724578 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9 16.8248392259 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.7 4.34317383033 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 7.41237113402 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.94845360825 152% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0707230877431 0.216113520407 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0399013065408 0.0766984524023 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0341282905256 0.0603063233224 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0559840409848 0.12726935374 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0359933655466 0.0580467560999 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 8.37731958763 156% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 70.7449484536 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 7.45979381443 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 8.71597938144 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 7.59969072165 110% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 41.2886597938 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 8.62886597938 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 8.54432989691 117% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 8.15463917526 123% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.