Write a letter to a city planning manager about the demolition of a historical building in your area.
In your letter, you should:
· explain why it shouldn’t be demolished.
· suggest a future use for this building.
· recommend a way to raise money for repairs.
Dear Sir or Madam,
I am writing this letter to express my concern about pulling down the historical monument of our city. I got this information from a local newspaper of our area.
My name is Ell Green and I am a resident of Velasca Street, Milan. I was really depressed with your decision to turn down this ancient building as this building is an asset to our city and it has just completed a century a week ago. We are very proud of it to have in our area. Moreover, This heritage building truly represents the traditional culture of ancient time and is well-known for its interior and exterior sculptured beauty. The walls of this old architecture depict the hand-made carvings of an ancient time.
With regard to future use, the local government can spend money on the refurbishment task. After this renovation work, this classical monument would attract many foreign visitors and the local authority can put a nominal entry fee for the visitors to raise money. This way, the money collected can be spent on the maintenance of it. In addition to this, the building can also be used for guided educational tours for school children.
In order to raise sufficient funds for repairing, the city council can collect donation from the local people and advertise in the newspapers to get charity from wide audience. Therefore, I request you to please reconsider your plan to demolition the building.
I hope for prompt consideration of this urgent request.
Yours faithfully,
Ell Green
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 27, column 10, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uest. Yours faithfully, Ell Green
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, moreover, really, so, therefore, well, in addition, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.48453608247 94% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 4.92783505155 122% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 5.05154639175 139% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.03092783505 0% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 32.9175257732 97% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 26.3917525773 129% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.85567010309 311% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1277.0 937.175257732 136% => OK
No of words: 254.0 206.0 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02755905512 4.54256449028 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 3.78020617076 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71796151088 2.54303337028 107% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 127.690721649 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610236220472 0.622605031667 98% => OK
syllable_count: 386.1 290.88556701 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.13402061856 120% => OK
Article: 5.0 0.824742268041 606% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 1.44329896907 277% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6804123711 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 16.3608247423 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4241382514 44.8134815571 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.1333333333 76.5299724578 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9333333333 16.8248392259 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 4.34317383033 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.29896907216 116% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 7.41237113402 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.94845360825 152% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309775401563 0.216113520407 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0948164977811 0.0766984524023 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0539653269186 0.0603063233224 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148828303271 0.12726935374 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.03581829066 0.0580467560999 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 8.37731958763 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 70.7449484536 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 7.45979381443 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 8.71597938144 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 7.59969072165 116% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 41.2886597938 172% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 8.62886597938 93% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 8.54432989691 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.8426966292 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.75 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.