Write a letter to a colleague who gave you a book that helped you for a presentation at work. You should:
Describe the presentation
Why was it important
How did it help you
Dear Ann,
I am writing to thank you for lending me the book for my presentation.
If you remember, our managing director came to our room a week ago, and he asked me to prepare a presentation on "Best Web Application Architecture". Although I had good knowledge of various architectures, at that moment, I was pretty confused and you brought me a book next day telling me that it would help me immensely.
Indeed, it helped me a lot to deliver my presentation yesterday. The presentation was well appreciated by all the members attending it. This presentation was not only for selecting the architecture for our next project, but it also was a kind of test on my ability to lead our team which I successfully passed, and the management decided me to promote me to the vacant team leader position.
The book provided me an in-depth comparison between the three-tier architecture and the two-tier architecture which I was somewhat confused about. Not only this, the pros and cons of these as well as other prominent architectures were well explained. This provided me enough clarity on the topic and hence I was able to deliver one of my best presentations to date.
Thank you once again for your help.
Best regards,
Son
- Universities should develop methods to support students who come from rural and disadvantageous backgrounds. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- Some people believe that teaching children at home is best for a child's development while others think that it is important for children to go to school. Discuss the advantages of both methods and give your own opinion. 67
- Write a letter to an English-speaking friend. In your letter – explain why you changed jobs – describe your new job – tell him/her your other news 56
- Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish.Why do you think this is happening?What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced? 78
- Some people say that advertising encourages us to buy things that we really do not need. Others say that advertisements tell us about new products that may improve our lives.Which viewpoint do you agree with? 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, well, kind of, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.48453608247 94% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 4.92783505155 20% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 5.05154639175 139% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.03092783505 132% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 32.9175257732 122% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 20.0 26.3917525773 76% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.85567010309 207% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1046.0 937.175257732 112% => OK
No of words: 212.0 206.0 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93396226415 4.54256449028 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.78020617076 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17303856379 2.54303337028 125% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 127.690721649 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589622641509 0.622605031667 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 323.1 290.88556701 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.13402061856 66% => OK
Article: 3.0 0.824742268041 364% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.83505154639 109% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.463917525773 647% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 1.44329896907 69% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6804123711 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 16.3608247423 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.6533029843 44.8134815571 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.0909090909 76.5299724578 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2727272727 16.8248392259 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.63636363636 4.34317383033 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.29896907216 116% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 7.41237113402 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.94845360825 51% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235539706974 0.216113520407 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101903998698 0.0766984524023 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.091261212202 0.0603063233224 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17967840979 0.12726935374 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0922798019756 0.0580467560999 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 8.37731958763 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 70.7449484536 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 7.45979381443 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 8.71597938144 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 7.59969072165 112% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 41.2886597938 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 8.62886597938 104% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 8.54432989691 112% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.