Dear Sir or Madam,
I am writing about a training course titled 'Digital Presence for Global Expansion of Business' advertised in a daily newspaper on 14th October. I believe it would be a helpful training and hoping to get your permission to participate in it.
In relation to the specifics of the training, it’s a four-day intensive session for Brand Managers and will be held on 20th to 23rd November. Registration (materials and meals included) fee is $200 and needs prior booking. Some renowned speakers would conduct the training at the BlueText Seminar Hall and more than 100 Brand Managers from different national and multinational companies are expected to participate in it.
Since this is a resourceful training session and would be helpful for us to expand our presence to a wider variety of digital channels, I am hoping you would exempt me from my duties for that time and consider reimbursing me for this seminar. I will get back to my normal work from 24th November.
It’s quite important to take advantage of this opportunity because, as you know, expanding our digital footprint and social presence for building comprehensive user engagement are key goals for my position this year. This seminar promises to make the participants ready for the challenges. After successful completion of the training, I would be able to put together actionable steps that I can take immediately to start engaging more seriously with our users.
Thank you for giving the matter your attention and I hope to hear your reply soon.
Yours faithfully,
William Brockie
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, you know
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.48453608247 107% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 4.92783505155 162% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 5.05154639175 218% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.03092783505 66% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 32.9175257732 100% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 26.3917525773 125% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.85567010309 233% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1331.0 937.175257732 142% => OK
No of words: 259.0 206.0 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.138996139 4.54256449028 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 3.78020617076 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86218380308 2.54303337028 113% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 127.690721649 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602316602317 0.622605031667 97% => OK
syllable_count: 402.3 290.88556701 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.13402061856 77% => OK
Article: 0.0 0.824742268041 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.83505154639 163% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 1.44329896907 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6804123711 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 16.3608247423 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.435850429 44.8134815571 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.916666667 76.5299724578 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5833333333 16.8248392259 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.33333333333 4.34317383033 31% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.29896907216 116% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 7.41237113402 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.94845360825 101% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273827709865 0.216113520407 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0967615229017 0.0766984524023 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0734986201352 0.0603063233224 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164285876595 0.12726935374 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0722378078875 0.0580467560999 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 8.37731958763 162% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 70.7449484536 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 7.45979381443 154% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 8.71597938144 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 7.59969072165 120% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 41.2886597938 177% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 8.62886597938 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 8.54432989691 122% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 8.15463917526 135% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.