Your town council is thinking about banning the use of mobile phones on public transport and in shops and restaurants. Write a letter to the town council giving your opinion about this and why you think it is or is not a good idea.
Dear Town Council,
I am writing to discuss the arguments about the ban on mobile phone use. It is common sense that citizens can probably use them almost everywhere, including public places like in stores, in restaurants, and on public transport.
On the one hand, the ban on mobile phone use can be disapproved by many of residents, who find it very convenient and essential in their daily life. Mobile phones make it easier to communicate in a vast and dynamic society these days. Therefore, as far as I am concerned, the prohibition of using cellphones should not be implemented given their many significant advantages.
On the other hand, when people freely use their phones, they cause a serious problem: noise. As a result, there may be no privacy when it comes to public places. Accordingly, the town authorities should impose some laws and rules concerning the use of mobile phones in publicity. People may not use their phones when they get on a bus. This may reduce the amount of noise and will not cause much annoyance to the surrounding passengers.
In conclusion, it is not expected to completely ban the use of mobile phones in public places, but it can manage to control some unwanted outcomes of using cellphones.
Best regards,
A citizen
Comments
Thanks
Thanks
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, if, may, so, therefore, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.48453608247 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 4.92783505155 183% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 5.05154639175 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.03092783505 165% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 32.9175257732 55% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 26.3917525773 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.85567010309 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1066.0 937.175257732 114% => OK
No of words: 215.0 206.0 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95813953488 4.54256449028 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.78020617076 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76853212841 2.54303337028 109% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 127.690721649 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581395348837 0.622605031667 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 339.3 290.88556701 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.13402061856 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 0.824742268041 485% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.83505154639 163% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.463917525773 431% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 1.44329896907 277% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6804123711 95% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 16.3608247423 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1518191848 44.8134815571 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.8333333333 76.5299724578 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9166666667 16.8248392259 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 4.34317383033 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 7.41237113402 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.49484536082 334% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.94845360825 25% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237909133335 0.216113520407 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0866095423557 0.0766984524023 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0947026411685 0.0603063233224 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137566560323 0.12726935374 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0556807187153 0.0580467560999 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 8.37731958763 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 70.7449484536 77% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 7.45979381443 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 8.71597938144 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 7.59969072165 117% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 41.2886597938 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 8.62886597938 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 8.54432989691 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 8.15463917526 135% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.