A letter: Banning the use of mobile phones
Your town council is thinking about banning the use of mobile phones on public transport and in shops and restaurants.
Write a letter to the town council giving your opinion about this and why you think it is or is not a good idea.
Dear Town Council,
I am writing to discuss the arguments regarding the ban on mobile phone use. It is common sense that citizens can probably use them almost everywhere, including public places like in stores, in restaurants, and on public transport.
On the one hand, the ban on mobile phone use can be disapproved by a large number of residents, who find it very convenient and essential in their daily life. Mobile phones make it easier to communicate in a vast and dynamic society these days. Therefore, as far as I am concerned, the prohibition of using cellphones should not be implemented given their many significant advantages.
On the other hand, when people freely use their phones, they cause a serious problem: noise. As a result, there may be no privacy when it comes to public places. Accordingly, the town authorities should impose some laws and rules concerning the use of mobile phones in publicity. People may not use their phones when they get on a bus. This may reduce the amount of noise and will not cause much annoyance to the surrounding passengers.
In conclusion, it is not expected to completely ban the use of mobile phones in public places, but it can manage to control some unwanted outcomes of using cellphones.
Best regards,
A citizen
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 68, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... mobile phone use can be disapproved by a large number of residents, who find it very convenient ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, if, may, regarding, so, therefore, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1078.0 1615.20841683 67% => OK
No of words: 217.0 315.596192385 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96774193548 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 4.20363070211 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78300573862 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 176.041082164 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.585253456221 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 342.9 506.74238477 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0733486505 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.8333333333 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0833333333 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291974856259 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103783376238 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0884903706031 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17702398317 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0402069113909 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.