In this day and age, with the rapid development of technology, it is argued that technology can bring numerous disadvantages to society instead of solving social problems. From my point of view, I partly agree with this view because of two main reasons.
It is undeniable that online crime and some serious health problems can be seen as results that technology needs to take responsibility for. Firstly, more and more people have a tendency to spend more time on technological devices such as cell phones or computers. By using these devices, they do not seem to go out and interact with other people. As a result, they can feel it difficult to communicate and even become isolated which makes them prone to depression and autism. Moreover, the emergence of online crime also poses a threat to social security. It is apparent that scammers who use fake accounts to deceive users and steal their private information for different purposes. For example, identity theft can use the information which they stole to scam the victim’s family for money.
However, technology has positive impacts on production as well as communication skills. When advanced techniques are put into practice, they can increase productivity. For instance, compared to using blue collar-workers as a main resource for production, enterprises can utilize automatic robots which work continuously for a long time. Therefore, businesses can meet customers' needs in a faster and better way. Furthermore, people can make friends with many kinds of people who come from different cultures as well as social status via social platforms with simple operations. This made a contribution to developing their communication skills together with gaining more profound knowledge which completed themselves.
To conclude, although some significant obstacles that technology can trigger to society, it also provides people with enormous influences. Hence, people should consider both pros and cons of technology and take advantage of its beneficial sides.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1705.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39556962025 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96054240441 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642405063291 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.4237727302 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.294117647 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5882352941 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.82352941176 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164637708495 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0482180144989 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0438148058107 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0937638481414 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0376112317718 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.