2020 has witnessed the outbreak of rare and new disease has been preying on
the minds of thousands of people in the world. Some people complain that this
illness has taken the lives of many people, slow down development in many
different fields; others claim that disease is an opportunity, thus, the world is getting
better.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
People have different views about the effect of the pandemic caused by a coronavirus in 2020. While many argue that the spread of the coronavirus will destroy economic growth, I am more convinced that it will change our planet in a positive way.
It is true that the appearance of the new virus has left businesses around the world counting the cost. Firstly, as many countries and world capitals have been put under strict lockdown, major industrial production chains have been brought to a halt. For example, the findings suggest that if Tokyo were to be locked down for two weeks, the loss in value-added production in the city would be 4.3 million yen. Secondly, as business remained closed during the coronavirus pandemic, an unrelenting job crisis continues to push countries onto unemployment rolls. In the US, the number of people filing for unemployment hit a record high, signaling an end to a decade of expansion for one of the world’s largest economies. Finally, many advanced economies are expected to enter a recession this year. The International Monetary Fund says that the global economy will shrink by 3% and describes the decline as the worst since The Great Depression of the 1930s.
In spite of the above arguments, I side with those who advocate the view that the event presents an opportunity: more flexible use of technology and revive appreciation for the outdoors. The first reason is regulatory barriers to online tools will fall. Many areas of our lives uptake on genuinely useful online technology have been slowed by powerful legacy players. However, because of the novel virus that keeps us contained in our homes, many families find that they prefer full or partial homeschooling or online homework. And many people also admitted that working from home is also effective as being in the office, which is thanks to the ability of wired applications. Another benefit worth mentioning is the improvement of air quality around the world. The COVID-19 has caused industrial activity to shut down and canceled flights and other journeys, slashing greenhouse emissions and air pollution worldwide. If there is something positive to take from this terrible crisis, it could be that it’s offered a taste of the air we might breathe in a low carbon future. The recent improvements could be made permanent by replacing fossil fuel with renewable energy and low-carbon sources.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-05-29 | haphuongpham49 | 84 | view |
| 2020-05-29 | haphuongpham49 | 56 | view |
- Some people work for the same organisation all their working life Others think it is better to work for different organisations 61
- The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the waterfront area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014 78
- Some say that sports play an important role in society Others think it is nothing more than a leisure activity Discuss both views 84
- The chart below gives information about Someland s main exports in 2000 20 and future projections for 2025 82
- The maps below show the changes in the art gallery ground floor in 2015 and the present day 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 228, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a positive way" with adverb for "positive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...onvinced that it will change our planet in a positive way. It is true that the appearance of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in spite of, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2014.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 396.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08585858586 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72592559322 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 176.041082164 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618686868687 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 630.9 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.9001802683 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.888888889 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05555555556 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182241271229 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0498411332118 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469883845169 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119665945651 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00174151221936 0.056905535591 3% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.