The advantages and disadvantages of using Facebook for learning
Besides traditional classroom, lots of means of online instruction for online learning are applied, including Facebook. However, whether Facebook is an efficient tool is a controversial problem. Personally, Facebook has both pros and cons for learning.
About the positive sides, there is no doubt that Facebook is a wonderful tool supporting for interacting, sharing documents and doing group work productively which Zoom or Meet could not compare with. Learning on Facebook is absolutely a good chance of making new friends who inspire us to learn. Moreover, Facebook is also a large useful source of knowledge about a variety of aspects, so students can refer to acquire new and helpful information. Also, studying documents could be stored for a long time thanks to Facebook, so we can review whenever we need them.
On the other hand, there are some drawbacks of Facebook affect negatively for learners. First, Facebook distracts students from learning. Most of us consider Facebook as a means of recreation rather than an educational tool, so students tend to not buckle down to learn seriously which influence adversely on the results of learning. Second, student can lose their learning target because of Facebook. Lots of hot news of their idols, attractive advertising of games or funny videos are some curious familiar things appearing before we get into exactly the pages to learn. Third, there is no clear boundary between learning and individual life which Meet or Zoom outweigh. The chaos of announcements relating to learning and other aspects such as the quantity of like or dislike of your new photos or status, the new posting of your friends, etc are cause for using Facebook as an educational tool unsuccessfully.
In a nutshell, there are some negative sides argue with the viewpoint that Facebook is a useful online learning tool. However, Facebook can be used as an effective means of online instruction as long as we can take advantage of the advantages of Facebook and stay away from its negative attractions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-10 | Trần Ánh Vy | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-17 | zanzendegi | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-06 | nhatkhang111 | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-06 | Nhi3132006 | 73 | view |
- Many people believe that undergraduate should reading regularly What is you viewpoint about this 84
- Many people believe that formal pen and paper examinations are not the best method of assessing educational achievement What is your view of examination 81
- Is a university degree the best way to have success in life 84
- The number of elderly people in the world is increasing What do you think are the positive and negative effects of this trend 78
- Some people think that children s free time must include educational activities otherwise they will waste their time What is your opinion 79
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, third, no doubt, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1716.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18429003021 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84032586318 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561933534743 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.4160048519 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.25 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6875 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.4082819978 0.244688304435 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139392999563 0.084324248473 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0585739294668 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.268360992076 0.151304729494 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0271145528577 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.