Advertisements are becoming more and more common in everyday life Is it a positive or negative development

Essay topics:

Advertisements are becoming more and more common in everyday life. Is it a positive or negative development?

Most of social activities take advantage of media to expand brand awareness. Therefore, commercials are becoming more and more ubiquitous in daily life. In the following paragraphs, I am declaring the reasons why I assume the development brought by advertisements is either positive and negative.

The first advantage I shoudl say is accessing to a huge array of social media users rapidly. It is not argued that conventional types of media gain in less popularity than the cutting-edge do. Thus valuable information would be spread in the wide scale. To be more precise, Tiktok gains hundreds thoundsands of interaction through one video. Second, commercials devote to meet market demand. Shopping online boosts the huge number of both consumers and producers. For example, in the period of pandemic, despite being isolated, people were still provided essential necessities through online shopping platforms.

However, negative influences are inevitable. The first disadvantage is exaggerate information. Some producers negotiate with advertisers to show the merchandises in media in better ways. For example, tourism introduces a lot of spectacular sceneries, but travellers see the opposite. Second, short comings are made up. Some businesses have tendacy to book reviewes to recieve overated feedbacks. For example, restaurants posts feedbacks that are opposite to their quality.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-03-26 reverjae 61 view
2024-03-23 lethianhthu 73 view
2024-03-19 reverjae 61 view
2024-03-10 phuong cao 89 view
2024-02-03 gtuez 89 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 194, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ss popularity than the cutting-edge do. Thus valuable information would be spread in...
^^^^
Line 5, column 72, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'exaggerated'.
Suggestion: exaggerated
...e inevitable. The first disadvantage is exaggerate information. Some producers negotiate w...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, still, therefore, thus, for example

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1183.0 1615.20841683 73% => OK
No of words: 207.0 315.596192385 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.71497584541 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 4.20363070211 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09223275778 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.700483091787 0.561755894193 125% => OK
syllable_count: 380.7 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 20.2975951904 59% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.9759996269 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 69.5882352941 106.682146367 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 12.1764705882 20.7667163134 59% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 4.23529411765 7.06120827912 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173763129389 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0438594177261 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0938795519875 0.0667982634062 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130228078924 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.131216843126 0.056905535591 231% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 42.38 50.2224549098 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.95 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.18 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.1190380762 67% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.