A highly controversial today relates to whether to have merits from the population which are expected to live longer for companies, the economy and community or not. In this essay, I am going to examine this question from both points of view and then I give my own perspective on the matter.
On one side of the arguments, there are people who argue that the benefits considerately outweigh its disadvantages. The main reason for believing this is that older generation tend to get numerous practical skills and valuable experience to pass on to youngsters. As a results, collaboratively working among the elderly and younger co-workers can help improve work productivity and increase profits, thereby boosting economic growth. Furthermore, this tendency could be beneficial for local community. This is because old residents are more likely to have social responsibilities than the juveniles. For example, while I hardly have time to take part in charity activities or environmental campaigns, my grandfather is willing to assume these duties whenever possible.
On the other hand, it is necessary to make the opposite case. It is often argued that in fact aging demographics could be detrimental for not only financial but also social terms. First of all, the elderly staffs are less creative and innovative than the younger ones to keep pace with modern advances in this technology-based society, which leads companies to impediment from progress. This directly poses a threat to the sustainable development of a nation. In addition to, if the aging population is increasing, the government has to allocates a significant number of resources to retirement pension or medical services. Therefore, there is less investment in other important fields, such as education and sports facilities, leading to imbalances in rounded development.
In conclusion, I personally believe aging demographics could bring greater drawbacks for enterprises, the economy as well as residential living standards.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 269, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a result' or simply 'results'?
Suggestion: a result; results
...experience to pass on to youngsters. As a results, collaboratively working among the elde...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 538, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'allocate'.
Suggestion: allocate
...on is increasing, the government has to allocates a significant number of resources to re...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, so, then, therefore, well, while, as to, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, as well as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1695.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46774193548 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20666741664 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.654838709677 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 544.5 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.480062145 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.0 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.7333333333 7.06120827912 180% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153391736729 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0440613037791 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0388000214662 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.096466867028 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0379266797554 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.