Globalization has become a trend that we cannot ignore nowadays. To cultivate the international communicating skill, children may start to learn foreign languages from little. Although acquiring different language skills can help children become competitive in society, others may argue that children should master their mother tongue first. From my perspective, I believe that children should learn different languages to fit in the global-village trend after they can use their own language well.
Some parents who care a lot about children education may arrange foreign language classes for their children preschool. They believe this may be the only way to cultivate bilingual ability. However, except for the classes, the children may not have the chances to use a foreign language. Lack of practicing can lead to failure of learning a new thing. Furthermore, spending much time on learning languages is not necessary to master it. Take Asian students for example, many Asian students have learned English form 6 years old, but still, need to cram for the language certification test while they grow up. Learning a foreign language in the earliest grade may not be a good choice to cultivate the ability.
Another reason makes learning foreign languages in early age unsuitable is language represent culture. Children should learn and get used to their own culture in the earliest grade. If they do not understand ways people live and custom in their home town, they may be confused by so many different cultures. Last but not least, the key to master different languages is ambition of learning. Forcing children to learn foreign languages may make them lose the interest of learning in the future. Thus, arranging language classes for children preschool may be not worth the loss.
In conclusion, to become a qualified global villager, children nowadays indeed need to learn different languages. However, before acquiring the second language skill, they should be a master of their own language first.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 284, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...r home town, they may be confused by so many different cultures. Last but not least, the key t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, second, so, still, thus, well, while, except for, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 7.85571142285 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1698.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30625 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72309996833 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 509.4 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.0471895321 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.3684210526 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8421052632 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.26315789474 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125042926667 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.050863765368 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0431618365393 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0871782334697 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.022588511389 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.