With all the problems in the world today, spending money on space exploration is a complete waste. The money could be better spent on other causes.
To what extent do you agree with this view?
Since the 1950s some governments have been allocating part of their budget to space exploration, and some people consider this to be a complete waste when we still have fundamental problems on Earth. I totally disagree with this view for two reasons.
Firstly, space exploration can help us combat climate change in a more effective way. Today, half the Americans still believe that global warming is a hoax, which is why the current government is not willing to take any action, refusing to acknowledge that climate change is caused by human activity. NASA has a department devoted to Earth science which specializes in collecting data about how our planet is changing. One goal behind this project is to raise public awareness about the causes of global warming by providing people with accurate data. Only then can the educated public unite to urge the government to take urgent measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions on a national scale.
Another area where space exploration can help with is the Internet. Today, it is obtained primarily through ground-based applications. However, these underground cables are not so efficient in reaching the remotest locations in the world as a result of which, more than half the world’s population still lives in digital darkness. To find a solution to this problem, the company called ‘One-Web’ wants to use space technology to provide everyone with internet access. In other words, in the future, the internet could be accessed via satellites at a much cheaper cost, if not for free.
To sum up, while it is true there are fundamental problems we need to address on our own planet, the technology created for space exploration can be applied to effectively solve the problems of climate change and the lack of internet access in poor countries. Therefore, I strongly believe we need to keep space exploration programs up and running.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, so, still, then, therefore, while, as a result, in other words, it is true, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1588.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10610932476 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78234095703 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614147909968 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.7020575921 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.428571429 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2142857143 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225632137806 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0737606432779 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0470932064786 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133287999908 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0452953208592 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.