With all the problems in the world today, spending money on space exploration is a complete waste. The money could be better spent on other causes. Discuss.
Due to rapid advancement in science fields which make it easier to get a vastly knowledge about space and other planets. However, a large sum of wealth expand on space research is never beneficial for the globe with so many issues. Additionally, it is lead to lots of complications such as harmful disease, polluted water, poverty, bed conditions of education and etcetera.
The main factor to support this perception is that today world is enduring from various types of perilous ailments which lead to deaths. Furthermore, some regions have not eligible to provide proper treatments to their natives due to lack of money. In addition to this, citizens of few nations are suffering from the problem to want pure water the reason is that their regimes have not any sufficient amount to utilise on clean water services. For example, in Africa, one million to two have been died since 1950 because they did not find a pure water to drink. So, with all these obstacles spending money on space exploration is a totally wastage.
Moving further, the another major concerning area is that a huge proportion of world are facing poverty so in that case if authorities expand a more than a three-quarter income on space than it give birth to so many problems. Adding in this, some parts of globe who are living under poorness and never able to earn bread and butter of three times than it is duty of governments to take necessary steps to tackle with these hurdles. In contrast, if regimes neglect the problem of poverty and give priority to space exploration than it take the whole world in depth of destroy. Even though, an education level of fewer regions are weaker . For instance, in some parts of Africa, humans have never know about how to run computers and modern technologies. So, it is big stain on country’s reputations.
In conclusion, although, utilities money on space research is good to gain vast knowledge about other planets, galaxies and so on but at some extent. On the other hand, this wealth could be better expand on medical, education, reduction in unemployment as well by government to build their nations strong.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 72, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('vastly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('knowledge') instead of another adjective.
...ence fields which make it easier to get a vastly knowledge about space and other planets. However,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 325, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...w nations are suffering from the problem to want pure water the reason is that th...
^^
Line 5, column 541, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'pure water'.
Suggestion: pure water
...ed since 1950 because they did not find a pure water to drink. So, with all these obstacles ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 632, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('totally') instead an adjective, or a noun ('wastage') instead of another adjective.
... spending money on space exploration is a totally wastage. Moving further, the another major...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 636, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...cation level of fewer regions are weaker . For instance, in some parts of Africa, ...
^^
Line 9, column 696, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'known'.
Suggestion: known
...some parts of Africa, humans have never know about how to run computers and modern t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, so, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, in fact, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 41.998997996 157% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1785.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 364.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90384615385 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68163902122 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57967032967 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 558.9 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4471726131 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.5625 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206583829 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0625378392682 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0763687512179 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118550647632 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0473837815163 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.