Alternative forms of transport should be encouraged and international laws introduced to control car ownership and use. What are your views
Cars have reshaped our world since they first rolled off mass production line in early 20th century. However the exhaust fumes hamper life, so an alternative to gas-powered vehicles and international laws now are becoming more attractive.
The truth is that, private cars cause the significant rise of greenhouse gases internationally. So the pollutants are airborne where they can mix with water vapor, forming the acid rain which is responsible for the habitant loss. Thus, in some countries the electric cars have grown in popularity. Although, they are not able to travel the required distances and their plodding speeds fail to compete with gas-powered cars. They are cleaner and more quite. The hope is that, with the new battery technology electric cars would be used as conventional car. Moreover, public transportation is an intrinsic part of modern cities such as: London, Paris and Moscow, three biggest and busiest underground systems in Europe which are continuing to expand, providing services for more people. Beside the effort of preventing the pollution, the electric train systems are now considering as a alternative transportation in the future.
And, as the electric railway systems seem to be the long term solution for the increase of private cars in the world, the international laws should be considered to encourage the populations use the public transports such as: increasing the gas fee or releasing the taxes, focusing on the airplane companies so that will lead civilization using buses or trains instead of planes or cars. By this way, we can take steps to solve the problems that private fuel-gas vehicles are claimed for.
In summary, we can not deny the contribution of cars to our daily life. Whereas with the untold harm to the environment, the new form of transportation, using eco-friendly power and the worldwide laws would save our environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 102, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... production line in early 20th century. However the exhaust fumes hamper life, so an al...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 450, Rule ID: QUIET_QUITE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'quiet'? 'quiet' means 'silent', 'quite' mean 'very' or 'to a moderate extent'
Suggestion: quiet
...powered cars. They are cleaner and more quite. The hope is that, with the new battery...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 882, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ic train systems are now considering as a alternative transportation in the futur...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, moreover, so, thus, whereas, in summary, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1587.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22039473684 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94329598527 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608552631579 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 83.4281127678 49.4020404114 169% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.357142857 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7142857143 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.21428571429 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215621433618 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0620670115524 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0611933431259 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125192723492 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.03481900489 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.