It is believed that people should change to different means of transportation besides automobiles and there should be more international legislation on possessing and driving cars. While there are various reasons to disagree with this argument, I reckon that this would bring about huge benefits as it will help to protect our environment and make road transport safer for everyone.
On the one hand, there are good reasons to support the reduction of excessive use of cars. One of the most obvious benefit this could bring is making our planet greener. Car emissions are among the major culprits of carbon footprint and global warming, which consequently exarcerbate the severity of natural disasters and causing respiratory issues. Studies have shown that the amount of toxic emission a car discharges in 40 minutes and suffocate a newborn baby and if the number of automobiles over the world declines by 10%, the annual growth in global temperature will be about 2% lower. In addition, restricting the number of cars on the road can help enhance road traffic safety. Fewer automobiles means lower possibility of accidents as drivers will have a better view and more spaces to change the direction of their vehicles and avoid crashes. It is also beneficial if driving laws are reinforced so that only qualified drivers are allowed on the road as according to research, about 70% of car accidents are caused by inexperienced drivers.
On the other hand, there are some reasons why it might not be a good idea to impose restrictions on the use of cars, such as the considerable inconvenience it may bring into people’s lives. Cars are ubiquitous nowadays as it helps people travel at ease and can be used for multiple purposes, from driving to work, picking up children to going on a short road trip on the weekend. They are much more convenient compared to bikes or motobikes thanks to their speed and the roof to cover people from different weather conditions. They are also smaller than buses so they can move easier on the road. If people are forced to giving up on travelling by cars, it can be very hard for them to find an alternative that is as fast and as convenient. It might be better if people are not completely banned from using cars but only encouraged to reduce their car usage as much as they can, such as by using public transport.
In conclusion, while automobiles bring about a much satisfying experience compared to other means, it is advantageous if people are encouraged to not overuse them and drive responsibly.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, if, may, so, while, i reckon, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 41.998997996 150% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2116.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 432.0 315.596192385 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89814814815 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55901411391 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77085557248 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523148148148 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 671.4 506.74238477 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.5785446468 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.25 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.375 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179704633882 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0561039140532 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0567152060848 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0969418259904 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0424987576319 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.