Alternative forms of transport should be encouraged and international laws introduced to control car ownership. Do you agree?
An increase in number of car-owners caused a plethora of issues whether the boundary should be settled by a legislation. More and more people believe that the authorities should take the question under their control and force the society to choose alternative means of transport.
To start with, it is apparent that cities are now overcrowded with automobiles, and this has a significant impact both on ecological and psychological living conditions. For instance, citizens are stuck in traffic jams, breathe polluted air, and feel uncomfortable because of produced noise. By the way, the main mission of any government is to provide a nation with safe and convenient life. People are unlikely to decline their comfort, so not many of us are ready to become ‘green’. Although, some are now aware of ecological disasters, we still buy a second or third car for a single household. Hence, the decrease in the amounts of cars on the roads is one of the problems, that should be fixed by special laws.
By the same token, international legislations might be more effective in this case, whereas the consideration of different nations’ experiences gives the opportunity to find the best solution. Various countries have chosen different measures, which seem likely to be combined. As for Spain, they settled a system of bicycle-sharing and excluded parts of the country from an automobile-roads maps. German authorities, by contrast, developed alternative machinery on solar or electric energy. Japan and China have the fastest public transport. One more protective measure was undertaken by Moscow with car-sharing services.
To summarize, I hardly can doubt that our society is conscious enough to stop the overuse of cars. That is the reason why both international and local legislation should be used to reduce the number of automobiles and settle a further control on the problem.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, second, so, still, third, whereas, as for, for instance, by the way, to start with, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1595.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26402640264 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08494896341 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630363036304 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.1308386285 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6875 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9375 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181576893792 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0506920364261 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0520743840657 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112720186628 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.04600162542 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.