Although it is widely recognized that cars damage the environment, their manufacture and use continue to increase. Why is this the case? How could this increase be controlled?
By all accounts, private cars have been damaging the pristine environment for years; however, high demand for this kind of transportation deems to grow exponentially. This essay will examine the potential causes of this situation and propose some optimal solutions to curb this spread.
Lack of public transport and the mobility of cars are attributed to the explosive growth in the number of manufactured cars. First and foremost, the shortage of public transport has facilitated drivers to oft for private cars to commute to work. Take Vietnam as a prime example, the absence of subways and sky trains are resulting in high demand for cars, which, in turn, is deteriorating gridlocked rush-hour traffic in metropolitan areas. Additionally, the mobility of cars also accounts for rising cars on roads. This is because drivers could reach their destination whenever they desire without depending on a fixed schedule like buses or trains.
There are various ultimate solutions to control the increase in the number of manufactured cars. One of the most irrefutable ways is to impose a strict environmental protection tariff on those who own a car. This is likely to exert the financial burden on cars owners, which will eventually encourage people to steer clear of commuting by car. In tandem with this, what the government could take actions is to connect a variety of public transports. For instance, relocating bus stations next to sky train stations will hinder commuters from walking a long distance to their office, which is likely to motivate people to stay away from driving a car to the workplace.
In conclusion, it is undeniable that private cars will exacerbate environmental problems that might indirectly harm humans. Nonetheless, the limitations of public transport and the mobility of cars have led to high demand for cars. From my perspective, levying strict environmental protection tax on car owners and consolidating a connectivity network among public transports might contribute to the fall in the number of cars.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, nonetheless, so, for instance, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1715.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26073619632 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97989834071 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564417177914 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2375103979 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.333333333 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7333333333 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204657978512 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0728668005797 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0515300963136 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129302890624 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0598831743804 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.