In some countries, owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people. Why is this the case?
Do you think this is a positive or negative situation?
There is a tendency for both city dwellers and rural citizens to take priority for homeownership over home renting. This essay will examine the potential causes and shed light on why the downsides of this trend far outweigh its advantages.
To begin with, long-term financial benefits and security deem to be the two most indispensable factors why a home purchase is crucial. With respect to the long-term financial gains, it is true that owning a home might be more economical in comparison with renting a home. In practice, homeowners might steer clear of a year-on-year increase in house price should they decide to purchase a home early; whereas, home tenants might undergo a boom in monthly renting fee and tax payment. Additionally, owning a home is likely to bring homeowners a sense of security. This is because homeownership might offer a precious opportunity for people to reside in a civilized community where other homeowners have high respect for the law, resulting in a sense of security among people.
Nonetheless, homeownership might deteriorate the unemployment rate. The fact that the more essential homeownership is, the higher the home price soars. This is likely to result in a large number of young citizens fails to afford a home, which, in turn, might contribute to a sharp fall in the number of the millennials migrating to metropolitan areas to apply for a job. Take the UK as a prime example, high home price has been deterring young people from moving to urban areas to seek a job. Consequently, the unemployment rate is creeping up in some parts of the UK.
In conclusion, homeownership might gain its prominence in several countries; however, its drawback can not be overlooked.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 181, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...rice soars. This is likely to result in a large number of young citizens fails to afford a home, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, however, look, nonetheless, so, well, whereas, as to, in conclusion, it is true, to begin with, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1436.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05633802817 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00819649978 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56338028169 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5814709859 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.461538462 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8461538462 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190858255089 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0648525127113 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0397487023649 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104446964627 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0653169038027 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.