Many people are travelling to other countries. Why? Is it a positive or negative development?
With the economic progression, people’s living standard is improved gradually, which results in the need for getting around to other famous tourist attractions worldwide. From my perspective, high income and culture discovery are the two most predominant drivers motivating people to travel to other countries, which deems to bring about both positive and negative impacts.
To begin with, high income stemming from positive economic growth rate and culture discovery expectation are the main contributors to the increasing outbound trips. First and foremost, the explosive growth in the economy has led to salary increments for employees, which, in turn, facilitates those people to visit an international tourist attraction to relax. Additionally, what foreign tourists completely expect from a foreign tour is to discover the traditions and culture of a new country. For instance, international tourists are appealed to Thai unique culture and scrumptious cuisine through social media at times. Thus, the number of international tourists in Thailand recently has been growing exponentially.
Nonetheless, travelling to an indigenous might bring about both pros and cons to foreign visitors. On the one hand, getting exposed to a foreign country might aid travellers to develop new positive behaviours. If travellers immerse themselves in a civilized culture in which standing in line in public is a norm, they are likely to adopt this habit in their home country. On the other hand, an outbound trip might force travellers to squander a large amount of money. This is because tourists have to pay hospitality and transport fees which are usually excessively expensive in some major tourist attractions, Bali, Indonesia, for example.
In conclusion, it is plausible that the need for travelling abroad in light of culture purpose and salary increments is likely to gain popularity in the years to come. It is my firm conviction that this tendency might result in both advantages and downsides to travellers.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, nonetheless, so, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1712.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50482315113 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00655638784 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569131832797 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6484261989 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.285714286 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2142857143 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07142857143 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183379674185 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0608688705888 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0731089136557 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110093416197 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0780211249552 0.056905535591 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.