Nowadays, more and more women decide to have children later in their life? why? Does the advantage or disadvantage?
The tendency to get pregnant after the 30s has become increasingly prevalent among women, especially in metropolitan areas of affluent countries. This essay will examine the potential culprits of this thorny issue and shed light on why the disadvantages of this trend far outweigh its advantages.
To begin with, there are arrays of reasons accounting for why women are inclined to give birth to children later in their life. One of the most irrefutable reasons is that women desire to steer clear of a financial burden. This is because giving and raising a child will likely to associate with a plethora of expensive expenses that tend to climb up rapidly in recent years such as childcare service and milk. As a result, these expenditures might be an excuse for women to conceive once their financial status is affordable. Additionally, what might restraint women from being pregnant is career prospects. In practice, the expectation to be independent of husbands has motivated women to get promoted at work to increase their income, resulting in late pregnancy.
By all accounts, this tendency might harm women and women. First of all, it is plausible that giving birth later in life could put a mother at high risks of infertility. This is because the older women get the harder they could become pregnant, which might pose a threat to the inability to birth-giving. In tandem with this, late pregnancy might exert severe pressure on children’s health. It is plausible that a woman’s immune system might deteriorate as time goes by, which hinders her immunity from fighting against a virus’s attack fruitfully. Consequently, a born child could suffer from illnesses such as Down as a result of the mother’s weak immunity.
In conclusion, late birth-giving might continue to be a trend among women on account of the described reasons. From my perspective, this tendency will cause negative impacts on both women and children’s health.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, if, so, in conclusion, such as, as a result, first of all, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1641.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16037735849 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87731037524 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588050314465 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.6763843433 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.5625 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.875 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8125 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151027042604 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0558943626877 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0550375972512 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0926352268784 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0361808963071 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.