In many countries, the proportion of older people is steadily increasing. Does this trend have more positive or negative effects on the society?
It is undeniable that the gradually ageing population has become among major issues facing both civilised and low-income developing countries for years. Personally, I contend that this phenomenon will have positive impacts on society in preference to the opposite side.
To begin with, an increase in the number of older people might trigger several unanticipated problems. One of the most irrefutable issues is the lack of labour workforce. Take Japan as a prime example, the plummeting employers derived from a soaring retirement rate required the government to employ foreign white-collar workers from less affluent countries to make up for the number of retired people, resulting in squandering money. Additionally, the gradual increase in the number of elderly people might exert severe pressure on the national budget. This is explained by a large amount of state budget will be allocated on pension fees and first aids, which might contribute to a deficit in the national budget.
Despite the described downsides above, there is a plethora of outstanding benefits that the ageing population could bring about to society. Indeed, the gradual jump in the number of older people might offer precious opportunities for graduates. In fact, soaring retired employers resulting from increasing elderly people is likely to create a host of vacancies for tertiary graduates, which, in turn, might alleviate the unemployment rate. In tandem with this, construction companies could take advantage of jumping older people. This is because of the high demand for sheltered accommodation to accommodate a large number of pensioners, resulting in increased profits for those enterprises.
In conclusion, although there are several positive impacts of the ageing population that could not be overlooked, it is my firm conviction that the advantages outweigh its drawbacks.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 609, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... sheltered accommodation to accommodate a large number of pensioners, resulting in increased prof...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, look, so, in conclusion, in fact, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1589.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55594405594 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96570491508 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594405594406 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.0043785065 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.230769231 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.53846153846 7.06120827912 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157330776983 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0586244714735 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0470135745636 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0914186203214 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0374640287232 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.03 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.