In many countries, plastic containers have become more popular than ever. They are used in many businesses, for example, food and drink industries. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
The demand for cans, bottles and other plastic-based containers has been growing exponentially in every corner of the world in recent years in light of convenience and mobility. While some contend that using plastic-wrapped products is advantageous, it is my firm conviction that the downsides surpass the benefits.
To begin with, using plastic-packed merchandise might bring about a plethora of benefits to customers and enterprises. Indeed, taking advantage of plastic products is likely to aid food and drink enterprises to steer clear of adding up manufacturing costs. This might result in an increase in products prices, which, in turn, will contribute to soaring year-on-year revenue for companies. Additionally, plastic-based products also help consumers to utilise used food cans and beverage bottles as a means of tree planting. Not only does this cultivation method provide customers with a variety of fresh vegetables, but also assist them not to squander money on supermarkets or restaurants.
Nonetheless, some would argue that products wrapped by plastics will trigger a host of unanticipated problems. One of the most alarming issues requiring a silver bullet to address is water contamination. This is because toxic chemical compounds leaking from landfill sites might deteriorate groundwater supplies, which is likely to have detrimental effects on humans’ health such as water-borne and cancer-related diseases. Another irrefutable problem caused by overdependence on plastic products is to exacerbate the number of massive deaths of several marine animals. Take sea turtles as a prime example, the explosive growth in the number of sea turtle deaths caused by being trapped in cans, nylons, and beverage bottles is creeping up gradually, which might lead to the unbalance of sea creatures.
In conclusion, although using products packed by plastic materials might bring about several inevitable benefits to food and beverage enterprises and consumers, I am of the opinion that the demerits exceed the merits.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, nonetheless, so, while, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1736.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63636363636 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18519566302 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623376623377 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9221119274 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.538461538 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6923076923 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.53846153846 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111541841138 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0411978129524 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0330219498081 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0722560761761 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0287474781533 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.73 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.16 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.