In the developed world, average life expectancy is increasing. What problems will this cause for individuals and society? Suggest some measures that could be taken to reduce the impact of ageing populations.
Demographic projections suggest that lifespan in the globe is likely to grow exponentially in the upcoming years. Although the tendency towards an ageing population will trigger several unanticipated problems, the ultimate solutions to mitigate the potential problems will be examined in this essay.
To begin with, the skyrocketed increase in average life expectancy might cause a plethora of issues. Indeed, the soaring pensioners will exert severe pressure on tax duty of working adults. In practice, the slump in the number of white-collar workers deriving from the increase in the number of people receiving a pension might pose a threat to working adults to make up for the deficit money. Additionally, the ageing population could be a burden on the healthcare system. Take Japan as a prime example, the government is considering to prolong the employment age to address the overwhelm of sheltered accommodations as well as the national budget for pension fee in the country.
There are several measures that the government could implement to tackle the problems described above. Easing the strict restrictions to allow the entry for foreign labour workers appears to be an ultimate solution. This is likely to confront the problem of the lack of labour workforce derived from the year-on-year jump in the number of pensioners. Another possible way forward is to call for fundings from private enterprises to subsidize healthcare fee. Transnational companies in developing countries, for instance, are mounting yearly campaigns to raise money for improving facilities in medical systems, which, in turn, will bring comfortable and up-to-the-minute medical services to pensioners.
In conclusion, although the ageing population is turning up as an alarming issue facing every country in the world, those problems caused by this phenomenon could be handled gradually by leading policy-makers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 577, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...o prolong the employment age to address the overwhelm of sheltered accommodations as well as ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, well, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 24.0651302605 25% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1617.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55670103093 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08567721203 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591065292096 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.9335554397 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.384615385 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3846153846 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.23076923077 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30723614442 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0952223757746 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0638151983356 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172628283315 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0202991728834 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.48 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.