Internet technology means people do not need to travel to foreign countries to understand how other others live. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
With the advances in technology, it is possible for travellers to immerse themselves in foreign countries’ culture and traditions at their fingertips without squandering a large amount of money. While some are in support of this statement, I agree with those who are in favour of authentic travel experiences to acquire an understanding of other cultures.
To begin with, internet-based travel will bring about a plethora of benefits for travellers. It is true that one of the most outstanding advantages is time-saving. This is because travellers are able to take advantage of the internet to grasp the traditions and customs of a foreign country, which, in turn, will save commuting time for travellers. Additionally, travelling through online platforms tends to hinder travellers from taking chances. Unanticipated problems, including terrorism and violent protests, have become alarming issues in several countries which might pose a threat to tourists. As a result, travelling through cyberspace is likely to help travellers to steer clear of such dangers.
Despite the described advantages above, I contend that getting around is the most effective way to have a deeper insight into others lives. Indeed, hands-on travel experiences might offer overseas tourists a precious opportunity to grasp the hidden sides of local lives on a regular basis. For instance, in some countries where the tourism industry is a main economic driver, local residents are struggling with keeping afloat since they have to take loans from banks to run homestay services. This will put severe pressure on their shoulders, which might result in financial hardship once they fail to make profits from tourism services.
In conclusion, although online platforms might provide tourists with inevitable positive impacts as mentioned above, it is my firm conviction that travellers should get around to gain authentic experience.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 357, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ire an understanding of other cultures. To begin with, internet-based travel wil...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, then, while, as to, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1628.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53741496599 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97236099596 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619047619048 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8972902966 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.230769231 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6153846154 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142998604322 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.050273397994 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0361407476561 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0837808948224 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0480113634257 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.99 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.