Some people believe that reading stories from a book is better than watching TV or playing computer games for children. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
With the advent of technological advances and printing industry, books and television along with computer games are increasing its prevalence among children to immerse themselves in. While others accept that reading stories from a book is more beneficial in preference to watching TV or playing computer games, I suppose that watching TV and computer-based games are as vital as reading stories.
On the one hand, reading stories tends to bring about a plethora of benefits to a young child. Firstly, reading stories might maximize children’s imagination, resulting in the formation of critical thinking later. Take a genius child as a prime example, the early exposure to storytelling might facilitate children to remain their brain active to take in story’s sequence, which, in turn, unintentionally consolidates a child’s ability to think critically. Furthermore, what children could benefit from reading stories is to boost their lexical range. This is because a story is inclined to contain an array of new vocabularies that might assist young readers to enhance their vocabulary on a wide range of topics.
On the other hand, others and I are also convinced by the statement that computer-based games and television shows also play an essential role in stress release and improving children’s comprehension skills, respectively. Concerning playing computer games, academic pressure from school might put children at high risks of depression, which could be addressed partly by playing computer games under an allowed amount of time. In tandem with this, watching television is also believed to help children sharpen their comprehension skills. Vietnamese children in affluent metropolitan areas, for instance, could get access to English movies since they were a child. Consequently, those children could take in a real conversation in English with a foreigner without any hurdles.
In conclusion, although some people might assert that reading stories is more beneficial than TV and computer games, it is my firm conviction that children should take advantage of both reading books and computer-based games.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-20 | thanhtam2709 | 84 | view |
| 2021-06-29 | Dupinder kaur | 56 | view |
- The only solution to improve safety on roads is to stricter punishment for driving offences To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- It is not necessary to travel to other places to learn the culture of other people We can learn just as much from books films and the internet Do you agree or disagree 84
- Advertisements are becoming more and more common in our everyday life Is it a positive or negative development 84
- Research indicates that nowadays some consumers are much less influenced by advertising than in the past What do you think are the reasons for this Do you think this is a positive or negative development Give reasons for your answer and include any releva 93
- Some people think that children should aim to their best at what they doing Others disagree Discuss both views and give your own opinion 65
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 716, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r vocabulary on a wide range of topics. On the other hand, others and I are also...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, so, while, for instance, i suppose, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1809.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56615384615 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04887213602 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578461538462 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.3586724816 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.153846154 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348967957806 0.244688304435 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11984937932 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0899336580855 0.0667982634062 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221818225862 0.151304729494 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0672795480357 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.