Films were produced by big companies in the past, but today people are able to make a film. Do you think this trend is positive or negative?
With the advent of technological advances, it is now possible for an array of individuals to participate in the film-making industry. From my perspective, this development will bring about both pros and cons.
On the one hand, this change in film-making workforces is likely to promote the development of the film industry and creating profits to individuals. Concerning the growth of the film industry, the fact that people could produce a film tends to arise competitiveness with large firms. As a result, what results from this competitiveness is to stimulate enterprises with hands-on experiences to give priorities for filming high-quality movies, which, in turn, will strengthen the explosive growth of the film sector. Additionally, individuals participating in film-making are inclined to earn a living. In practice, movies produced by individuals tend to air an opinion or mirror the current trends of society. This up-to-the-minute content is mighty to result in high views, which is likely to help movie makers to earn supplement income.
On the other hand, this development could have a detrimental effect on the young. To begin with, films produced by individuals might severely affect the young’s viewpoints. Take Vietnam as a prime example, children’s inappropriate behaviours stemming from watching short movies produced by individuals are now becoming uncontrollably. This is because filmmakers usually upload the complete production on social media and their youtube channel, which is quite challenging for the legal authorities to have a vigorous check. Consequently, those movies with violent or anti-government contents are still inherent in social media that might nurture the offsprings with aggressive behaviours.
In conclusion, the breakthroughs and devices of cutting-edge technology have been providing people with a plethora of precious opportunities to produce a film. It is my firm conviction that this transformation is likely to result in both advantages and downsides.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, so, still, then, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1716.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6821192053 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.40234325896 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576158940397 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3380049916 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.4 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1333333333 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.06666666667 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229625329553 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.083972386094 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0611358250168 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138679579672 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0672893258646 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.66 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.