Films were produced by big companies in the past but today people are able to make a film Do you think this trend is positive or negative

Essay topics:

Films were produced by big companies in the past, but today people are able to make a film. Do you think this trend is positive or negative?

These days, filmmaking has no longer been restricted to large corporations as individuals can easily make videos. This shift has profound effects on cinematography, and I would argue that it brings about both merits and demerits.
On the one hand, amateur filmmakers would bring considerate benefits. First, Independent films equal creative freedom. It can be explained by the fact that Producers of independent films are able to express themselves freely as they do not have to follow the same demands that big box office films have to. Second, independent films can employ more explicit, honest, and deal with more sensitive issues. In fact, As independent films are made outside of major Hollywood studios, they are also not as heavily censored.
On the other hand, Despite the admitted pros listed above, the widespread of amateur filmmakers comes at a price. First, independent movie creators are not under regulations and are more likely to infringe the copyright, causing damage to big brands’ reputations and profits. Second, as small-budget movies do not undergo censorship, they can be rife with violent or offensive content. For example, many videos on Youtube employ some inappropriate scenes such as pornography to increase viewership, leaving detrimental effects on the audience, especially those at impressionable ages.
In conclusion, although the emerging trend of individuals making films may downgrade the quality of films, this shift allows more diversity and honest content.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 87, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'filmmakers'' or 'filmmaker's'?
Suggestion: filmmakers'; filmmaker's
...listed above, the widespread of amateur filmmakers comes at a price. First, independent mo...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, may, second, so, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1270.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 231.0 315.596192385 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49783549784 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94065921547 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.658008658009 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 396.0 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.246306843 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.833333333 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.08333333333 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184007223314 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0603961678807 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0631075514983 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104162422189 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0681967057586 0.056905535591 120% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.