An American film actor once said, “Tomorrow is important and precious”. Some people think individuals and society should pay more attention to the future than to the present. Do you agree or disagree?
Hitherto, globalization has led to many living credos, and the question of whether people should concentrate on preparing for the present or the future has been appealing public’s concerning. While some residents argue that the present is the uppermost target of their life, I completely lean forward the latter one by giving some rational evidence.
It is conspicuous that having foreseeable eyesight brings societies tons of value. On economic standpoint, future-preparing can contribute to the country by giving rational solutions for potential issues such as investigating budget or tourist attraction strategies. Further and more importantly, though, economists can base on the prevailing market to make a conclusion for industries’ trend, so that can direct people to have reasonable marketing ways. A vivid example is related to Samsung, having recognized the 2019- phone market was saturated, Samsung decided to lead the pack by introducing a brand new foldable phone which marked a milestone of portable device evolution. It took this company just several months to gain huge profits and flourish to the top digital company in that year.
On the other hand, people whose credo is concentrated on the present because it can carry immediate advantages and profits for them can not survive in this day and age. The biggest drawback of this belief is that they can get obstacles in their daily expense or even in their career. Seldom do people choose a short-term plan customarily gives people a small budget, otherwise the long-term one is on the opposite. Therefore, unforeseeable people will not have enough money and their company will be soon bankrupted. If people agree that they are having a wonderful present, it must be routed perfectly from the past.
By way of conclusion, caring about the future is obviously more important than the present
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 60, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
...tion has led to many living credos, and the question of whether people should concentrate on preparing ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, therefore, while, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1570.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2861952862 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91694055686 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632996632997 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3083600377 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.769230769 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8461538462 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.38461538462 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151186658981 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.054884892341 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0522288334364 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112778286532 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0560757742807 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.