: Some people store personal and private information online, including banking, contacts and addresses. Is it a positive or negative trend?
Hitherto, the question of whether keeping personal details online brings benefit or drawback to clients has been raising public attention. While many people lament that this modern way is better, I agree to this statement by giving some vivid evidences
On the one hand, it is impossible to avoid risk of being taken details kept on the internet. The development of public standard means there are more criminals not only in the prevailing days but also on the social network. Hackers can utilize our mistake and break into our system in order to take our privacy away. Furthermore, personal details are critical so they can be sold to some one who need them, which means they get our number and can contact us through phone number. But the authorities are making effort to introduce as much safety policy as possible, so this problem can be got at the source.
It is conspicuous that storing information online can fraught us with advantages. We can easily recognize that online securities will be developed due to the demand for keeping information online. More and more storing systems are being create, moreover, the developer in the prevailing day try to connect their system to banks or police station, this will create high charisma for them. The convenience is the best benefit that we can not overlook, we can look up our password in case we forget it, therefore, the situation of forgetting password will not happen in future.
In conclusion, the modern way is always better than the traditional once.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
Hitherto, the question of whether keeping personal details online brings ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 294, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ke and break into our system in order to take our privacy away. Furthermore, pers...
^^
Line 2, column 385, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'someone'?
Suggestion: someone
...ils are critical so they can be sold to some one who need them, which means they get our...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 564, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
... of forgetting password will not happen in future. In conclusion, the modern way is alwa...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, look, moreover, so, therefore, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1261.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92578125 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5664240867 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.62109375 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 396.0 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2671883392 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.636363636 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2727272727 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.81818181818 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11573100857 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0448399555674 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0482558249631 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0603667239714 0.151304729494 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0431551187708 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.