In some countries, more young adults continue to live with their parents even after they have completed education and found jobs. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Hitherto, globalization has led to the interference of credo about living with parents, and the question of whether the co-staying with parents brings young adults benefits or not has been raising public attention. While many people lament that adolescent should separate with their parents after having jobs, I oppose this view by giving some rational evidence.
It is conspicuous that there are huge advantages of co-living with parents. First, young adults can spend more time with their family, instead of spending time rushing with deadline or earning money, adolescent should make their time for family. There is an increasing rate of far-living youngers around the world, and this will deter the young to directly contact with their parents, experts also have recorded a soaking trend of elderly who went to nursing home in recent years. Furthermore, in the near future, open-space will be of a rarity to human-beings, while resident are rushing to buy an apartment to stay in the future, our parents have their own house which can be our accommodation. This can save a huge budget for us to pay for daily expenses or even married fee, a vivid example is that in China, almost adolescent live with their parent due to the shortage of space, and they have to save a huge amount of money in order to have a wife.
On the other hand, a minority of people concern that they do not have much private space while living with adults, however, this is not necessary because in this day and age, parents will actively let you use almost house-space as you want to adapt your demand.
In conclusion, instead of separate from parents, the young should learn how to stay with them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 93, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
...of credo about living with parents, and the question of whether the co-staying with parents brings youn...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 23, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tional evidence. It is conspicuous that there are huge advantages of co-living w...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, if, so, while, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1397.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86759581882 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50572315324 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585365853659 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.9625662129 49.4020404114 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.222222222 106.682146367 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.8888888889 20.7667163134 154% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.11111111111 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289599375808 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121896339776 0.084324248473 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.036564372395 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15867894316 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0714893463747 0.056905535591 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.56 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.