Some people store personal and private information online, including banking, contacts, and addresses. Is it a positive or negative trend?
It is true that a growing number of people have put their personal details online. While there are undoubtedly dangers in this, I would argue that the convenience of putting such data online outweighs the negative aspects.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that storing personal data online poses several threats. Firstly, personal information which is held online may be stolen or misused in
some way by cybercriminals. For example, With the aid of advances in technology, online banking is now common. Unless our passwords are exceptionally secure, there is the possibility that someone else will be able to hack into our online accounts to access our private data. Secondly, companies can sell personal information and other data to third-party sources. For instance, For advertisers, having this information available for purchase is immensely valuable. Therefore, data brokers can make money by selling this information to one another and advertisers.
On the other hand, the storage of personal information online is convenient in various ways. To begin with, providing banking information online offers users the convenience of completing transactions over the Internet that have been traditionally conducted within a local bank branch. For example, Online users only need to fill out their personal details once which includes bank card numbers, contacts, and residential addresses, and then they can simply pay bills, shop online, or book tickets every time they want. Furthermore, From a business perspective, this sort of personal information is essential for operating online targeted advertising. People speculate this might be due to the fact that consumer data offers a way to better understand and meet their customers' demands. By analyzing customer behavior, as well as vast troves of reviews and feedback, companies can nimbly modify their digital presence, goods, or services to better suit the current marketplace.
In conclusion, despite the risks of personal online information falling into the wrong hands, I would argue that the convenience of sharing this information outweighs these risks.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, third, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, sort of, as well as, it is true, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2098.0 1615.20841683 130% => OK
No of words: 388.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40721649485 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85542817837 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561855670103 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 664.2 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5921350181 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.411764706 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8235294118 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7058823529 7.06120827912 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250702387156 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0898437123662 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0497841521143 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151391665016 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0384364541031 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.