Today, TV channels provide man’s sport show more than women’s sport show. Why? Should TV channel give equal time for women’s sport and men’s sport?
These days, it is true that there are significant differences between men's and women's sports coverage on TV channels. Significantly more time is dedicated to showing men’s sports than women’s sport. However, I believe that women should get as much coverage as men on broadcasts.
On the one hand, there are many reasons for the dominance of men over women on TV programs. First, due to a large proportion men sports viewers, TV channels tend to produce more sports programs for man to maximize their ratings and profits. Take football as an example, it is easy to catch groups of men having discussions about recent men's football matches, while women show a preference for shopping and lifestyles. Second, because men perform better than women in sports such as boxing and bodybuilding, they play at a much higher level. Therefore, their competitions are more exciting to watch.
On the other hand, I am of the opinion that it is necessary for TV channels to provide equal coverage for both genders. To begin with, it can create equality for gender. It will help in overcoming gender stereotype. When exposed to more women's sports, people can gradually change their perceptions that women are weaker than men, and realize that they are capable of playing sports as well as men. It helps to promote an equal stance of men and women. Furthermore, it also helps to promote a healthy message to the public. Exposure on television channels is the key to heightening people’s awareness of the health benefits of good health. Since television has a large audience reach, it will motivate more people, particularly women to exercise and thus improve their health.
In conclusion, although it is understandable why men's sports are prioritized on TV broadcasts compared to women's sports, I truly believe that it is vital to provide equal time showing on the TV for both genders because of the aforementioned reasons.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, therefore, thus, well, while, in conclusion, such as, as well as, it is true, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1521.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97058823529 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77610291683 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545751633987 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 5.43587174349 239% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.1204891307 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.0625 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.125 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0625 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.511561027616 0.244688304435 209% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145265602375 0.084324248473 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11244775648 0.0667982634062 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.325321427329 0.151304729494 215% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0629950213631 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.