Today, TV channels provide man's sport show more than women's sport show. Why? Should TV channel give equal time for women's sport and men's sport?
Nowadays, men's sport show is provided more often than women's sport show on many TV channels. In this essay, I will attempt to explain the reason for that phenomenon and give my support of balancing the time for two entertainment shows.
First, some people may find men's sport programs more interesting than women's so the TV producers would rather pay more attention to the man's sport show. To explain, males tend to be more skillful and more attractive than females when they play sport because they, in likelihood, have beautiful muscles, strong bones, perfect bodies. While women may be believed to be more elegant and clumsier, so they might make the viewers' mood down. As the result, the men's sport may be aired more often so that the network might earn large profits and attract more investment
However, it is necessary to give equal time for women's and men's games because there are also some people who tend to be attracted by women's performance. It is undeniable that professional sports players need powerful health but there are also some sports that may need flexible movement. Females may well be the more suitable players for those kinds of sports because of the fact that they tend to be underweight. While men's movement seems to be rigid and may make the viewers feel like not to know whether to laugh or cry.
All in all, that a wider number of audiences prefer watching the men's sport show makes the TV producers tend to be biased toward that strategy, but I may support the idea of providing equal time for women's and men's sport
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 417, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'viewers'' or 'viewer's'?
Suggestion: viewers'; viewer's
...nt and clumsier, so they might make the viewers mood down. As the result, the mens spor...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 361, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_THE_FACT_THAT[1]
Message: This phrase is redundant. Use simply 'because'.
Suggestion: because
...table players for those kinds of sports because of the fact that they tend to be underweight. While mens...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, so, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1279.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71955719557 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34102525233 2.80592935109 83% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531365313653 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 383.4 506.74238477 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.5126111798 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.9 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.451570174791 0.244688304435 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.215155699146 0.084324248473 255% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.1705036945 0.0667982634062 255% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.335406203097 0.151304729494 222% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0857456076027 0.056905535591 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.